PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWAN vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWAN vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWAN achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 9.70% return.


SWAN

1D
-0.61%
1M
3.71%
YTD
5.21%
6M
4.34%
1Y
17.67%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*

RSP

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWAN vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SWAN
Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF
5.21%13.93%13.44%12.07%-27.77%10.55%16.17%22.03%-2.23%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.70%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-9.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SWAN and RSP is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018

0.65

The correlation between SWAN and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWAN vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWAN
RSP

Technology

35.6%
19.6%

Financial Services

11.8%
14.5%

Communication Services

11.2%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.9%

Healthcare

8.5%
11.0%

Industrials

8.3%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
6.5%

Energy

3.5%
4.5%

Utilities

2.4%
6.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
6.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.1%

Technology

SWAN
35.6%
RSP
19.6%

Financial Services

SWAN
11.8%
RSP
14.5%

Communication Services

SWAN
11.2%
RSP
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SWAN
10.1%
RSP
9.9%

Healthcare

SWAN
8.5%
RSP
11.0%

Industrials

SWAN
8.3%
RSP
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

SWAN
4.9%
RSP
6.5%

Energy

SWAN
3.5%
RSP
4.5%

Utilities

SWAN
2.4%
RSP
6.1%

Real Estate

SWAN
1.9%
RSP
6.0%

Basic Materials

SWAN
1.8%
RSP
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWAN vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWAN
SWAN Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SWAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWAN Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SWAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWAN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWAN vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWANRSPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

1.70

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.71

2.47

+0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.49

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.93

9.48

+0.45

SWAN vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWAN and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWANRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.70

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.52

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.57

+0.01

Drawdowns

SWAN vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWAN drawdown since its inception was -31.04%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAN and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWANRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.04%

-59.92%

+28.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-7.85%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.07%

-17.81%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.04%

-21.38%

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.38%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.88%

-6.65%

-2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

2.06%

-0.28%

Volatility

SWAN vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that SWAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWANRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

2.56%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

8.29%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.39%

11.56%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.33%

16.18%

-4.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.47%

18.35%

-5.88%

SWAN vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWAN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWAN vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%
SWAN
Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF
2.79%2.86%2.54%2.98%2.12%5.04%1.64%3.69%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWAN and RSP have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWAN has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWAN dropped -31.04% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 5-year performance, RSP leads with 8.33% vs 3.38% for SWAN. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RSP has performed better with a 8.33% return vs 3.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SWAN.

SWAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

SWAN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while RSP is S&P 500. SWAN tracks S-Network BlackSwan Core Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SWAN and 0.20% for RSP.

SWAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWAN and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer