SWAN vs. QQQ
SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SWAN is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWAN returned 3.38%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for QQQ. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWAN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
SWAN vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWAN achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
SWAN
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 4.34%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.85%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
SWAN vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 5.21% | 13.93% | 13.44% | 12.07% | -27.77% | 10.55% | 16.17% | 22.03% | -2.23% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -9.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWAN and QQQ is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018 | 0.72 |
The correlation between SWAN and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
SWAN vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SWAN
QQQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SWAN
QQQ
Financial Services
SWAN
QQQ
Communication Services
SWAN
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
SWAN
QQQ
Healthcare
SWAN
QQQ
Industrials
SWAN
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
SWAN
QQQ
Energy
SWAN
QQQ
Utilities
SWAN
QQQ
Real Estate
SWAN
QQQ
Basic Materials
SWAN
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWAN vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SWAN
QQQ
SWAN vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWAN | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | 2.64 | -0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.71 | 3.45 | -0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.45 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 3.51 | -0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.93 | 13.49 | -3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWAN | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 2.64 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.81 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.41 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
SWAN vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWAN drawdown since its inception was -31.04%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAN and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWAN | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.04% | -82.97% | +51.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -11.96% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.07% | -22.77% | +10.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.04% | -35.12% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.26% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -32.79% | +23.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 3.11% | -1.33% |
Volatility
SWAN vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) is 3.48%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that SWAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWAN | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 4.49% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.28% | 12.10% | -4.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.39% | 15.94% | -6.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.33% | 22.38% | -11.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.47% | 22.29% | -9.82% |
SWAN vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWAN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWAN vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 2.79% | 2.86% | 2.54% | 2.98% | 2.12% | 5.04% | 1.64% | 3.69% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWAN and QQQ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to SWAN (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWAN dropped -31.04% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs 3.38% for SWAN. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, SWAN has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 3.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SWAN.
SWAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
SWAN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. SWAN tracks S-Network BlackSwan Core Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SWAN and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWAN and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer