PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVOL vs. RYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SVOL vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SVOL vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SVOL
Simplify Volatility Premium ETF
-7.92%2.41%6.77%22.88%-3.30%12.25%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
0.70%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%8.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVOL achieves a -7.92% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 0.70% return.


SVOL

1D
1.52%
1M
-6.10%
YTD
-7.92%
6M
-5.42%
1Y
3.66%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
10Y*

RYLD

1D
2.12%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
0.70%
6M
5.49%
1Y
11.70%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SVOL vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVOL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SVOL vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVOL
SVOL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVOL vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SVOLRYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.09

0.72

-0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.45

1.13

-0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.19

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

0.92

-0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.57

4.48

-3.90

SVOL vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVOL and RYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SVOLRYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

0.72

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.26

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between SVOL and RYLD is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SVOL vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

SVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.14%, more than RYLD's 12.14% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
SVOL
Simplify Volatility Premium ETF
23.14%19.82%16.79%16.36%18.32%4.65%0.00%0.00%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
12.14%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%

Drawdowns

SVOL vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVOL drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVOL and RYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SVOLRYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.50%

-41.53%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.73%

-12.33%

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.30%

-4.31%

-5.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-9.04%

+4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.46%

2.53%

+4.93%

Volatility

SVOL vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) is 4.34%, while Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that SVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SVOLRYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

5.25%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.82%

9.08%

+4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.84%

16.39%

+22.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.28%

14.20%

+8.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.28%

17.38%

+4.90%