PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVOL vs. BNDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SVOL vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SVOL vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SVOL
Simplify Volatility Premium ETF
-7.62%2.41%6.77%22.88%-3.30%12.25%
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
0.09%5.02%2.42%7.18%-12.88%0.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVOL achieves a -7.62% return, which is significantly lower than BNDW's 0.09% return.


SVOL

1D
0.33%
1M
-6.42%
YTD
-7.62%
6M
-5.90%
1Y
3.26%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
10Y*

BNDW

1D
0.13%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.53%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SVOL vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVOL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SVOL vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVOL
SVOL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDW
BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVOL vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SVOLBNDWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.08

0.95

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.43

1.34

-0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.17

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

1.35

-1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.53

4.95

-4.41

SVOL vs. BNDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVOL and BNDW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SVOLBNDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

0.95

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.37

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between SVOL and BNDW is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SVOL vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

SVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.07%, more than BNDW's 4.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SVOL
Simplify Volatility Premium ETF
23.07%19.82%16.79%16.36%18.32%4.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
4.18%4.12%3.90%3.73%2.02%2.58%1.56%3.05%1.66%

Drawdowns

SVOL vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVOL drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, which is greater than BNDW's maximum drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVOL and BNDW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SVOLBNDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.50%

-17.22%

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.73%

-2.70%

-22.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.01%

-1.85%

-8.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-5.05%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.49%

0.73%

+6.76%

Volatility

SVOL vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) at 1.67%. This indicates that SVOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SVOLBNDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

1.67%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.82%

2.29%

+11.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.84%

3.53%

+35.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.27%

5.17%

+17.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.27%

4.92%

+17.35%