SVC vs. TWO
SVC (Service Properties Trust) and TWO (Two Harbors Investment Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — SVC in REIT - Hotel & Motel, TWO in REIT - Mortgage. Over the past 10 years, SVC returned -21.95%/yr vs -3.33%/yr for TWO. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SVC vs. TWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVC achieves a -12.85% return, which is significantly lower than TWO's 26.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SVC has underperformed TWO with an annualized return of -21.95%, while TWO has yielded a comparatively higher -3.33% annualized return.
SVC
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -8.37%
- 6M
- -19.41%
- YTD
- -12.85%
- 1Y
- -37.83%
- 3Y*
- -39.20%
- 5Y*
- -28.22%
- 10Y*
- -21.95%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.39%
TWO
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 8.91%
- YTD
- 26.99%
- 1Y
- 41.10%
- 3Y*
- 10.40%
- 5Y*
- -0.72%
- 10Y*
- -3.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.62M | $16.24M | $15.79M | |
| $40.95M | $28.10M | $26.44M |
SVC vs. TWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVC Service Properties Trust | -12.85% | -26.30% | -67.28% | 29.07% | -14.50% | -23.23% | -51.47% | 10.84% | -13.51% | 0.66% |
TWO Two Harbors Investment Corp. | 26.99% | 2.52% | -2.73% | 2.31% | -23.25% | 0.03% | -52.19% | 28.73% | -10.33% | 26.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVC and TWO is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2009 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SVC and TWO has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
SVC:
$261.85M
TWO:
$1.27B
SVC:
-$1.43
TWO:
-$0.44
SVC:
0.75
TWO:
1.48
SVC:
$1.74B
TWO:
$645.74M
SVC:
-$195.32M
TWO:
$526.40M
SVC:
$214.45M
TWO:
$249.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVC vs. TWO — Risk / Return Rank
SVC
TWO
SVC vs. TWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Service Properties Trust (SVC) and Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVC | TWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.28 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 1.12 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 3.19 | -4.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVC vs. TWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVC drawdown since its inception was -94.13%, which is greater than TWO's maximum drawdown of -84.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVC and TWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVC | TWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.13% | -84.71% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.08% | -36.81% | -22.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.68% | -36.81% | -47.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.42% | -51.13% | -36.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.13% | -84.71% | -9.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.07% | -56.08% | -35.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.99% | -28.83% | +1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.58% | 12.92% | +20.66% |
Volatility
SVC vs. TWO - Volatility Comparison
Service Properties Trust (SVC) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) at 1.27%. This indicates that SVC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVC | TWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.94% | 1.27% | +6.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.91% | 27.19% | +18.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.94% | 39.91% | +16.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.02% | 32.72% | +21.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.64% | 47.99% | +8.65% |
Dividends
SVC vs. TWO - Dividend Comparison
SVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than TWO's 12.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVC Service Properties Trust | 2.54% | 2.17% | 24.02% | 9.37% | 3.16% | 0.46% | 4.96% | 8.84% | 8.84% | 6.93% | 6.40% | 8.31% |
TWO Two Harbors Investment Corp. | 12.30% | 15.52% | 15.22% | 15.08% | 12.94% | 11.79% | 7.85% | 11.42% | 14.64% | 23.31% | 10.67% | 12.84% |
Financials
SVC vs. TWO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Service Properties Trust and Two Harbors Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SVC and TWO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVC has higher volatility (7.94%) compared to TWO (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVC dropped -94.13% vs TWO's -84.71%.
TWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVC and TWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer