PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SVC vs. TWO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SVCTWO
YTD Return-64.06%-4.95%
1Y Return-58.69%-2.86%
3Y Return (Ann)-31.49%-10.33%
5Y Return (Ann)-31.46%-17.93%
10Y Return (Ann)-16.03%-5.57%
Sharpe Ratio-1.29-0.10
Sortino Ratio-2.100.02
Omega Ratio0.741.00
Calmar Ratio-0.67-0.03
Martin Ratio-1.81-0.35
Ulcer Index31.94%6.28%
Daily Std Dev45.02%22.42%
Max Drawdown-86.44%-84.71%
Current Drawdown-86.44%-67.04%

Fundamentals


SVCTWO
Market Cap$488.28M$1.23B
EPS-$1.47-$4.69
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.88B-$420.60M
Gross Profit (TTM)$600.76M-$541.48M
EBITDA (TTM)$315.28M-$305.35M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between SVC and TWO is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

SVC vs. TWO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SVC achieves a -64.06% return, which is significantly lower than TWO's -4.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SVC has underperformed TWO with an annualized return of -16.03%, while TWO has yielded a comparatively higher -5.57% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-51.17%
-4.69%
SVC
TWO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SVC vs. TWO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Service Properties Trust (SVC) and Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SVC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SVC, currently valued at -1.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.29
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SVC, currently valued at -2.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-2.10
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SVC, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.74
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SVC, currently valued at -0.67, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.67
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SVC, currently valued at -1.81, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.81
TWO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TWO, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.10
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TWO, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TWO, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TWO, currently valued at -0.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TWO, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.35

SVC vs. TWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVC Sharpe Ratio is -1.29, which is lower than the TWO Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVC and TWO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.29
-0.10
SVC
TWO

Dividends

SVC vs. TWO - Dividend Comparison

SVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.86%, more than TWO's 15.57% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SVC
Service Properties Trust
21.86%9.37%3.16%0.46%4.96%8.84%8.84%6.93%6.40%7.61%6.34%7.05%
TWO
Two Harbors Investment Corp.
15.57%15.08%12.94%11.79%7.85%11.42%14.64%10.65%10.67%12.84%10.38%12.61%

Drawdowns

SVC vs. TWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVC drawdown since its inception was -86.44%, roughly equal to the maximum TWO drawdown of -84.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVC and TWO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-86.44%
-67.04%
SVC
TWO

Volatility

SVC vs. TWO - Volatility Comparison

Service Properties Trust (SVC) has a higher volatility of 20.11% compared to Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) at 8.23%. This indicates that SVC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
20.11%
8.23%
SVC
TWO

Financials

SVC vs. TWO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Service Properties Trust and Two Harbors Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items