SVC vs. PSA
SVC (Service Properties Trust) and PSA (Public Storage) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — SVC in REIT - Hotel & Motel, PSA in REIT - Specialty. Over the past 10 years, SVC returned -21.95%/yr vs 7.65%/yr for PSA. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SVC vs. PSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVC achieves a -12.85% return, which is significantly lower than PSA's 28.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SVC has underperformed PSA with an annualized return of -21.95%, while PSA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.65% annualized return.
SVC
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -8.37%
- 6M
- -19.41%
- YTD
- -12.85%
- 1Y
- -37.83%
- 3Y*
- -39.20%
- 5Y*
- -28.22%
- 10Y*
- -21.95%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.39%
PSA
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 22.25%
- YTD
- 28.04%
- 1Y
- 21.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 7.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $523.75M | $410.09M | $335.38M | |
| $12.62M | $16.24M | $15.79M |
SVC vs. PSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVC Service Properties Trust | -12.85% | -26.30% | -67.28% | 29.07% | -14.50% | -23.23% | -51.47% | 10.84% | -13.51% | 0.66% |
PSA Public Storage | 28.04% | -9.69% | 2.09% | 13.60% | -20.20% | 66.63% | 12.69% | 8.96% | 0.62% | -2.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVC and PSA is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 1995 | 0.44 |
The correlation between SVC and PSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (10 years) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SVC:
$261.85M
PSA:
$60.77B
SVC:
-$1.43
PSA:
$11.63
SVC:
0.75
PSA:
11.73
SVC:
2.66
PSA:
6.26
SVC:
$1.74B
PSA:
$4.89B
SVC:
-$195.32M
PSA:
$2.95B
SVC:
$214.45M
PSA:
$3.38B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVC vs. PSA — Risk / Return Rank
SVC
PSA
SVC vs. PSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Service Properties Trust (SVC) and Public Storage (PSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVC | PSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.17 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 1.35 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 3.01 | -4.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVC vs. PSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVC drawdown since its inception was -94.13%, which is greater than PSA's maximum drawdown of -60.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVC and PSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVC | PSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.13% | -60.19% | -33.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.08% | -16.20% | -42.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.68% | -25.62% | -59.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.42% | -37.93% | -49.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.13% | -37.93% | -56.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.07% | -5.06% | -87.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.99% | -15.75% | -11.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.58% | 7.22% | +26.36% |
Volatility
SVC vs. PSA - Volatility Comparison
Service Properties Trust (SVC) and Public Storage (PSA) have volatilities of 7.94% and 8.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVC | PSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.94% | 8.02% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.91% | 17.99% | +27.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.94% | 23.06% | +32.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.02% | 24.14% | +29.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.64% | 23.53% | +33.11% |
Dividends
SVC vs. PSA - Dividend Comparison
SVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than PSA's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSA Public Storage | 3.68% | 4.62% | 4.01% | 3.93% | 7.55% | 2.14% | 3.46% | 3.76% | 3.95% | 3.83% | 3.27% | 2.62% |
SVC Service Properties Trust | 2.54% | 2.17% | 24.02% | 9.37% | 3.16% | 0.46% | 4.96% | 8.84% | 8.84% | 6.93% | 6.40% | 8.31% |
Financials
SVC vs. PSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Service Properties Trust and Public Storage. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SVC vs. PSA - Profitability Comparison
SVC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Service Properties Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 364.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PSA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Public Storage reported a gross profit of 888.78M and revenue of 1.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.
SVC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Service Properties Trust reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 364.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
PSA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Public Storage reported an operating income of 466.68M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.9%.
SVC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Service Properties Trust reported a net income of -151.18M and revenue of 364.45M, resulting in a net margin of -41.5%.
PSA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Public Storage reported a net income of 502.94M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in a net margin of 40.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SVC and PSA have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSA has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to SVC (7.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVC dropped -94.13% vs PSA's -60.19%.
PSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVC and PSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer