PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVC vs. O
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SVC vs. O - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Service Properties Trust (SVC) and Realty Income Corporation (O). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVC achieves a -8.74% return, which is significantly lower than O's 8.26% return. Over the past 10 years, SVC has underperformed O with an annualized return of -19.84%, while O has yielded a comparatively higher 4.58% annualized return.


SVC

1D
-3.49%
1M
10.67%
YTD
-8.74%
6M
-9.72%
1Y
-26.72%
3Y*
-39.29%
5Y*
-29.71%
10Y*
-19.84%

O

1D
-0.32%
1M
-5.46%
YTD
8.26%
6M
5.55%
1Y
12.57%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*
4.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVC vs. O - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SVC
Service Properties Trust
-8.74%-26.30%-67.28%29.07%-14.50%-23.23%-51.47%10.84%-13.51%0.66%
O
Realty Income Corporation
8.26%12.20%-2.11%-4.55%-7.38%23.95%-11.60%21.27%15.94%3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SVC and O is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between SVC and O has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

SVC:

-$1.43

O:

$1.17

PS Ratio

SVC:

0.16

O:

6.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

SVC:

$1.74B

O:

$5.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SVC:

-$195.32M

O:

$3.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

SVC:

$214.45M

O:

$3.93B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVC vs. O — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVC
SVC Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVC Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVC Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

O
O Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
O Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
O Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
O Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
O Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
O Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVC vs. O - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Service Properties Trust (SVC) and Realty Income Corporation (O). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SVCODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.46

0.79

-1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.32

1.13

-1.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.14

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

1.14

-1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.85

2.88

-3.73

SVC vs. O - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVC Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the O Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVC and O, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SVCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

0.79

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.55

0.13

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.35

0.18

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.48

-0.51

Drawdowns

SVC vs. O - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVC drawdown since its inception was -94.13%, which is greater than O's maximum drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVC and O.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.13%

-48.45%

-45.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.83%

-11.10%

-49.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.75%

-26.49%

-58.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.82%

-34.48%

-55.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.13%

-48.28%

-45.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.69%

-10.44%

-81.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.65%

-9.21%

-17.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.62%

4.37%

+27.25%

Volatility

SVC vs. O - Volatility Comparison

Service Properties Trust (SVC) has a higher volatility of 14.79% compared to Realty Income Corporation (O) at 5.48%. This indicates that SVC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than O based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.79%

5.48%

+9.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.25%

11.72%

+34.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.79%

15.95%

+41.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.57%

18.87%

+35.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.49%

25.63%

+30.86%

Dividends

SVC vs. O - Dividend Comparison

SVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than O's 5.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
O
Realty Income Corporation
5.42%6.19%5.37%5.33%4.68%3.87%4.51%3.69%4.19%4.45%4.18%4.41%
SVC
Service Properties Trust
2.41%2.17%24.02%9.37%3.16%0.46%4.96%8.84%8.84%6.93%6.40%8.31%

Financials

SVC vs. O - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Service Properties Trust and Realty Income Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B20222023202420252026
364.45M
1.55B
(SVC) Total Revenue
(O) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SVC vs. O - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Service Properties Trust and Realty Income Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
SVC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Service Properties Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 364.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

O - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SVC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Service Properties Trust reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 364.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

O - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

SVC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Service Properties Trust reported a net income of -151.18M and revenue of 364.45M, resulting in a net margin of -41.5%.

O - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported a net income of -9.17M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in a net margin of -0.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SVC and O have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SVC has higher volatility (14.79%) compared to O (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVC dropped -94.13% vs O's -48.45%.

O currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVC and O

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer