SVBAX vs. VTTHX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SVBAX (John Hancock Balanced Fund) and VTTHX (Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund) are both mutual funds - SVBAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by John Hancock, while VTTHX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past 10 years, SVBAX returned 9.84%/yr vs 9.37%/yr for VTTHX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SVBAX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VTTHX.

Performance

SVBAX vs. VTTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund (VTTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVBAX achieves a 10.52% return, which is significantly higher than VTTHX's 7.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SVBAX having a 9.84% annualized return and VTTHX not far behind at 9.37%.

SVBAX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 0.34%
• 6M: 8.19%
• YTD: 10.52%
• 1Y: 20.18%
• 3Y*: 15.23%
• 5Y*: 8.47%
• 10Y*: 9.84%
• ALL TIME*: 7.88%

VTTHX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.37%
• 6M: 4.84%
• YTD: 7.56%
• 1Y: 16.57%
• 3Y*: 13.74%
• 5Y*: 7.26%
• 10Y*: 9.37%
• ALL TIME*: 7.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SVBAX John Hancock Balanced Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VTTHX Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SVBAX vs. VTTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SVBAX John Hancock Balanced Fund	10.52%	15.69%	13.31%	18.22%	-15.79%	14.49%	15.97%	21.28%	-5.02%	13.40%
VTTHX Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund	7.56%	17.55%	11.56%	17.37%	-16.64%	12.96%	14.80%	22.44%	-6.57%	16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SVBAX and VTTHX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2003	0.92

The correlation between SVBAX and VTTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SVBAX vs. VTTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SVBAX

SVBAX Risk / Return Rank: 87
SVBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SVBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
SVBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SVBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SVBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

VTTHX

VTTHX Risk / Return Rank: 65
VTTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VTTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
VTTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
VTTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VTTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SVBAX vs. VTTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund (VTTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SVBAX	VTTHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	1.63	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	2.31	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.30	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	2.23	+1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.84	9.22	+6.62

SVBAX vs. VTTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVBAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the VTTHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVBAX and VTTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SVBAX vs. VTTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.81%, smaller than the maximum VTTHX drawdown of -51.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVBAX and VTTHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SVBAX	VTTHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.81%	-51.76%	+10.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.57%	-7.17%	+1.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.06%	-10.87%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.53%	-23.53%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.00%	-27.15%	+6.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-1.44%	+1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.22%	-6.06%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	1.73%	-0.51%

Volatility

SVBAX vs. VTTHX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund (VTTHX) have volatilities of 2.88% and 2.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SVBAX	VTTHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	2.90%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.43%	8.25%	-0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.11%	9.79%	-0.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.92%	11.50%	-0.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.82%	12.41%	-1.59%

SVBAX vs. VTTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVBAX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than VTTHX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

SVBAX vs. VTTHX - Dividend Comparison

SVBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.34%, more than VTTHX's 2.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SVBAX John Hancock Balanced Fund	11.34%	12.45%	3.72%	1.48%	1.60%	2.73%	1.60%	2.19%	8.06%	3.51%	1.70%	4.57%
VTTHX Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund	2.75%	2.96%	3.12%	2.47%	2.71%	19.52%	2.50%	2.33%	2.69%	0.16%	2.77%	4.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SVBAX and VTTHX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, SVBAX and VTTHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SVBAX or VTTHX?

VTTHX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to SVBAX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVBAX dropped -40.81% vs VTTHX's -51.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SVBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.