SUZ vs. NRG

In the year-to-date period, SUZ achieves a -14.23% return, which is significantly lower than NRG's 74.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SUZ has underperformed NRG with an annualized return of 7.17%, while NRG has yielded a comparatively higher 23.01% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Suzano S.A. (SUZ) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SUZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the NRG Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUZ and NRG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

SUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than NRG's 1.09% yield.

The maximum SUZ drawdown since its inception was -90.78%, which is greater than NRG's maximum drawdown of -79.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUZ and NRG.

The current volatility for Suzano S.A. (SUZ) is 7.31%, while NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) has a volatility of 24.10%. This indicates that SUZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Suzano S.A. and NRG Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.