SUSW.L vs. XSX6.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) and Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L).
SUSW.L and XSX6.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SUSW.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 12, 2017. XSX6.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Jan 20, 2009. Both SUSW.L and XSX6.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SUSW.L or XSX6.L.
Key characteristics
SUSW.L | XSX6.L | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 17.65% | 3.57% |
1Y Return | 26.76% | 10.61% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 6.77% | 3.42% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 12.66% | 6.48% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.16 | 1.13 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.87 | 1.64 |
Omega Ratio | 1.44 | 1.19 |
Calmar Ratio | 2.83 | 1.76 |
Martin Ratio | 11.86 | 5.11 |
Ulcer Index | 2.04% | 2.25% |
Daily Std Dev | 11.14% | 10.20% |
Max Drawdown | -32.09% | -28.43% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -5.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSW.L and XSX6.L is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SUSW.L vs. XSX6.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SUSW.L achieves a 17.65% return, which is significantly higher than XSX6.L's 3.57% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SUSW.L vs. XSX6.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SUSW.L and XSX6.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SUSW.L vs. XSX6.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) and Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SUSW.L vs. XSX6.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SUSW.L nor XSX6.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SUSW.L vs. XSX6.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSW.L drawdown since its inception was -32.09%, which is greater than XSX6.L's maximum drawdown of -28.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSW.L and XSX6.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SUSW.L vs. XSX6.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) is 3.27%, while Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF 1C (XSX6.L) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that SUSW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSX6.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.