PortfoliosLab logo
SUSB vs. VCLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SUSB and VCLT is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

SUSB vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SUSB:

2.69

VCLT:

0.19

Sortino Ratio

SUSB:

4.26

VCLT:

0.52

Omega Ratio

SUSB:

1.58

VCLT:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

SUSB:

5.24

VCLT:

0.17

Martin Ratio

SUSB:

14.74

VCLT:

0.75

Ulcer Index

SUSB:

0.48%

VCLT:

5.07%

Daily Std Dev

SUSB:

2.53%

VCLT:

11.71%

Max Drawdown

SUSB:

-13.25%

VCLT:

-34.31%

Current Drawdown

SUSB:

-0.07%

VCLT:

-20.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSB achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly higher than VCLT's 0.32% return.


SUSB

YTD

2.78%

1M

0.57%

6M

2.53%

1Y

6.77%

3Y*

4.14%

5Y*

1.72%

10Y*

N/A

VCLT

YTD

0.32%

1M

0.17%

6M

-4.53%

1Y

2.18%

3Y*

0.26%

5Y*

-2.63%

10Y*

2.64%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SUSB vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SUSB vs. VCLT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SUSB is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SUSB is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SUSB is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SUSB is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SUSB is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SUSB is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

VCLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VCLT is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VCLT is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VCLT is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VCLT is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VCLT is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VCLT is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SUSB vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SUSB Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the VCLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSB and VCLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

SUSB vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison

SUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than VCLT's 5.93% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SUSB
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
4.16%3.81%2.81%1.74%1.14%1.87%2.83%2.62%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.49%5.19%4.67%4.44%3.07%3.16%3.81%4.55%4.01%4.33%4.68%4.29%

Drawdowns

SUSB vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSB drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSB and VCLT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

SUSB vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) is 0.73%, while Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) has a volatility of 3.16%. This indicates that SUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...