STZ vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: STZ or PG.
Key characteristics
STZ | PG | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 9.18% | 15.32% |
1Y Return | 18.21% | 10.84% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 5.30% | 9.50% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 6.77% | 12.26% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 13.88% | 10.53% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.00 | 0.79 |
Daily Std Dev | 17.52% | 14.08% |
Max Drawdown | -81.94% | -54.23% |
Current Drawdown | -3.32% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
STZ | PG | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $47.93B | $393.79B |
EPS | $9.38 | $6.12 |
PE Ratio | 27.93 | 27.26 |
PEG Ratio | 2.21 | 3.28 |
Revenue (TTM) | $9.96B | $84.06B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $4.71B | $39.25B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $3.62B | $24.22B |
Correlation
The correlation between STZ and PG is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
STZ vs. PG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, STZ achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 15.32% return. Over the past 10 years, STZ has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 13.88%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.53% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
STZ vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
STZ vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than PG's 2.29% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constellation Brands, Inc. | 1.40% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.29% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% | 2.78% | 2.91% |
Drawdowns
STZ vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STZ drawdown since its inception was -81.94%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STZ and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
STZ vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 2.35%. This indicates that STZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
STZ vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Brands, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities