STZ vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: STZ or PG.
Correlation
The correlation between STZ and PG is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
STZ vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
STZ:
-1.08
PG:
0.48
STZ:
-1.34
PG:
0.74
STZ:
0.79
PG:
1.10
STZ:
-0.76
PG:
0.69
STZ:
-1.75
PG:
1.89
STZ:
17.14%
PG:
4.33%
STZ:
27.70%
PG:
16.96%
STZ:
-75.46%
PG:
-54.23%
STZ:
-31.59%
PG:
-5.10%
Fundamentals
STZ:
$33.03B
PG:
$397.45B
STZ:
$3.75
PG:
$6.28
STZ:
48.73
PG:
26.99
STZ:
1.12
PG:
3.41
STZ:
$8.04B
PG:
$64.15B
STZ:
$4.18B
PG:
$32.96B
STZ:
$910.90M
PG:
$17.75B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STZ achieves a -16.83% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, STZ has underperformed PG with an annualized return of 5.94%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.
STZ
-16.83%
4.25%
-27.80%
-30.40%
8.37%
5.94%
PG
1.72%
-3.47%
-0.22%
8.17%
10.80%
10.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
STZ vs. PG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
STZ
PG
STZ vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
STZ vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than PG's 2.38% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 2.21% | 1.77% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% | 0.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.38% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.32% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
STZ vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STZ drawdown since its inception was -75.46%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STZ and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
STZ vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) has a higher volatility of 7.68% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 5.45%. This indicates that STZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
STZ vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Brands, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities