STZ vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: STZ or PG.
Correlation
The correlation between STZ and PG is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
STZ vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
STZ:
-0.09
PG:
1.24
STZ:
0.01
PG:
1.77
STZ:
1.00
PG:
1.24
STZ:
-0.11
PG:
2.10
STZ:
-0.23
PG:
7.16
STZ:
7.66%
PG:
2.60%
STZ:
19.41%
PG:
14.98%
STZ:
-75.45%
PG:
-54.23%
STZ:
-15.42%
PG:
-5.85%
Fundamentals
STZ:
$42.31B
PG:
$401.13B
STZ:
$3.12
PG:
$5.80
STZ:
74.71
PG:
29.37
STZ:
1.22
PG:
3.60
STZ:
$7.72B
PG:
$83.91B
STZ:
$3.91B
PG:
$43.14B
STZ:
$715.30M
PG:
$22.14B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STZ achieves a -4.48% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 18.33% return. Over the past 10 years, STZ has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 10.34%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.26% annualized return.
STZ
-4.48%
-5.49%
-12.80%
-1.77%
5.32%
10.34%
PG
18.33%
-0.92%
2.11%
20.49%
8.86%
9.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
STZ vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
STZ vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than PG's 2.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 1.72% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.34% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.32% | 2.78% | 2.91% |
Drawdowns
STZ vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STZ drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STZ and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
STZ vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 4.60%. This indicates that STZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
STZ vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Brands, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities