PortfoliosLab logo
STZ vs. PG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between STZ and PG is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

STZ vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%2,000.00%4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%10,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-99.10%
8,504.98%
STZ
PG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

STZ:

-0.85

PG:

-0.08

Sortino Ratio

STZ:

-0.98

PG:

0.04

Omega Ratio

STZ:

0.85

PG:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

STZ:

-0.24

PG:

-0.10

Martin Ratio

STZ:

-1.27

PG:

-0.23

Ulcer Index

STZ:

19.01%

PG:

5.05%

Daily Std Dev

STZ:

28.93%

PG:

18.86%

Max Drawdown

STZ:

-100.00%

PG:

-54.23%

Current Drawdown

STZ:

-99.40%

PG:

-10.61%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STZ:

$33.29B

PG:

$376.35B

EPS

STZ:

-$0.45

PG:

$6.29

PEG Ratio

STZ:

1.28

PG:

3.91

PS Ratio

STZ:

3.27

PG:

4.54

PB Ratio

STZ:

4.84

PG:

7.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

STZ:

$10.21B

PG:

$83.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STZ:

$5.30B

PG:

$43.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

STZ:

$774.40M

PG:

$23.39B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STZ achieves a -12.40% return, which is significantly lower than PG's -4.18% return. Over the past 10 years, STZ has underperformed PG with an annualized return of 6.51%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.10% annualized return.


STZ

YTD

-12.40%

1M

12.57%

6M

-17.01%

1Y

-24.43%

5Y*

4.49%

10Y*

6.51%

PG

YTD

-4.18%

1M

0.81%

6M

-1.69%

1Y

-1.52%

5Y*

9.16%

10Y*

10.10%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

STZ vs. PG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of STZ is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of STZ is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of STZ is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of STZ is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of STZ is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of STZ is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

PG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PG is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PG is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PG is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PG is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PG is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PG is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

STZ vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current STZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STZ and PG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.85
-0.08
STZ
PG

Dividends

STZ vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than PG's 2.57% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
2.12%1.77%1.44%1.36%1.21%1.37%1.58%1.70%0.86%0.98%0.65%0.00%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.57%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.32%2.78%

Drawdowns

STZ vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STZ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STZ and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-99.40%
-10.61%
STZ
PG

Volatility

STZ vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 7.15%. This indicates that STZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.88%
7.15%
STZ
PG

Financials

STZ vs. PG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Brands, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
2.16B
19.78B
(STZ) Total Revenue
(PG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

STZ vs. PG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Constellation Brands, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

44.0%46.0%48.0%50.0%52.0%54.0%56.0%20212022202320242025
51.5%
51.0%
(STZ) Gross Margin
(PG) Gross Margin
STZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 2.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.5%.

PG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.08B and revenue of 19.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.0%.

STZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -150.30M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.9%.

PG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.56B and revenue of 19.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.

STZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -375.30M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in a net margin of -17.3%.

PG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 3.77B and revenue of 19.78B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.