STZ vs. LANC

In the year-to-date period, STZ achieves a -15.63% return, which is significantly lower than LANC's 10.41% return. Over the past 10 years, STZ has underperformed LANC with an annualized return of 6.15%, while LANC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.67% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current STZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the LANC Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STZ and LANC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than LANC's 1.95% yield.

The maximum STZ drawdown since its inception was -75.46%, which is greater than LANC's maximum drawdown of -54.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STZ and LANC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) has a higher volatility of 9.28% compared to Lancaster Colony Corporation (LANC) at 7.23%. This indicates that STZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Brands, Inc. and Lancaster Colony Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.