PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STX vs. ASML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STX vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seagate Technology plc (STX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STX achieves a 192.10% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 63.12% return. Over the past 10 years, STX has outperformed ASML with an annualized return of 44.07%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively lower 33.59% annualized return.


STX

1D
1.88%
1M
-24.97%
6M
146.58%
YTD
192.10%
1Y
442.73%
3Y*
143.47%
5Y*
62.35%
10Y*
44.07%
ALL TIME*
23.72%

ASML

1D
-0.49%
1M
-9.88%
6M
28.45%
YTD
63.12%
1Y
138.60%
3Y*
37.24%
5Y*
20.47%
10Y*
33.59%
ALL TIME*
27.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STX vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STX
Seagate Technology plc
192.10%225.26%4.06%69.12%-51.42%87.50%10.14%62.14%-2.90%16.67%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
63.12%56.51%-7.70%39.91%-30.49%64.13%66.06%93.56%-9.80%56.23%

Correlation

The correlation between STX and ASML is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2002

0.44

The correlation between STX and ASML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STX:

$179.93B

ASML:

$670.25B

EPS

STX:

$10.48

ASML:

€27.54

PE Ratio

STX:

76.60

ASML:

55.22

PEG Ratio

STX:

0.92

ASML:

3.63

PS Ratio

STX:

16.54

ASML:

16.63

PB Ratio

STX:

167.09

ASML:

26.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

STX:

$11.01B

ASML:

€35.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STX:

$4.57B

ASML:

€18.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

STX:

$2.59B

ASML:

€13.77B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STX vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STX
STX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
STX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
STX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
STX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
STX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STX vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seagate Technology plc (STX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STXASMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.42

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.03

7.81

+6.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

49.15

24.29

+24.86

STX vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STX Sharpe Ratio is 6.39, which is higher than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STX and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STX vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STX drawdown since its inception was -88.74%, roughly equal to the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STX and ASML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXASMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.74%

-90.00%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.81%

-17.85%

-13.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.00%

-45.38%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.99%

-56.84%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.99%

-56.84%

-0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.60%

-12.59%

-14.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.39%

-28.06%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.06%

5.75%

+3.31%

Volatility

STX vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

Seagate Technology plc (STX) has a higher volatility of 27.07% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 17.75%. This indicates that STX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXASMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.07%

17.75%

+9.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.95%

36.22%

+17.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.03%

45.08%

+24.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.44%

43.09%

+3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.33%

39.00%

+3.33%

Dividends

STX vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

STX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than ASML's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.51%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
STX
Seagate Technology plc
0.37%1.05%3.27%3.28%5.32%2.40%4.21%4.27%6.53%6.02%6.60%6.14%

Financials

STX vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seagate Technology plc and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
3.11B
9.33B
(STX) Total Revenue
(ASML) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. STX values in USD, ASML values in EUR

STX vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Seagate Technology plc and ASML Holding N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
46.5%
54.0%
Portfolio components
STX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seagate Technology plc reported a gross profit of 1.45B and revenue of 3.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.

ASML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 5.04B and revenue of 9.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.

STX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seagate Technology plc reported an operating income of 982.00M and revenue of 3.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

ASML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.46B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.

STX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Seagate Technology plc reported a net income of 748.00M and revenue of 3.11B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.

ASML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.92B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STX and ASML have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STX has higher volatility (27.07%) compared to ASML (17.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STX dropped -88.74% vs ASML's -90.00%.

STX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.39 vs 3.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STX and ASML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer