STWD vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

STWD (Starwood Property Trust, Inc.) is a stock, while QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Over the past 10 years, STWD returned 7.70%/yr vs 9.99%/yr for QYLD. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

STWD vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STWD achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.89% return. Over the past 10 years, STWD has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 7.70%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.99% annualized return.

STWD

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -3.18%
• YTD: -4.41%
• 6M: -4.22%
• 1Y: -8.33%
• 3Y*: 6.92%
• 5Y*: 0.24%
• 10Y*: 7.70%

QYLD

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: 1.41%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 7.59%
• 1Y: 22.55%
• 3Y*: 13.99%
• 5Y*: 8.26%
• 10Y*: 9.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STWD vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
STWD Starwood Property Trust, Inc.	-4.41%	4.91%	-0.56%	26.70%	-17.33%	35.88%	-12.01%	36.80%	1.11%	6.08%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.89%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	10.41%	8.72%	22.69%	-3.07%	18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between STWD and QYLD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013	0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between STWD and QYLD has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

STWD vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STWD

STWD Risk / Return Rank: 21
STWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
STWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
STWD Omega Ratio Rank: 20
STWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
STWD Martin Ratio Rank: 23

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 84
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STWD vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STWD	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.50	2.34	-2.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.59	3.28	-3.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.52	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.58	4.56	-5.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.93	25.38	-26.31

STWD vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STWD Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STWD and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STWD vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STWD drawdown since its inception was -66.34%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STWD and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	STWD	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.34%	-24.75%	-41.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.53%	-4.97%	-9.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.66%	-19.06%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.65%	-24.61%	-5.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.34%	-24.75%	-41.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.65%	-2.10%	-11.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.58%	-3.82%	-3.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.95%	0.89%	+8.06%

Volatility

STWD vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) have volatilities of 4.68% and 4.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STWD	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.68%	4.78%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.29%	8.50%	+3.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.79%	9.70%	+7.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.22%	14.84%	+9.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.14%	15.56%	+14.58%

Dividends

STWD vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

STWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.47%, less than QYLD's 11.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.68%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%
STWD Starwood Property Trust, Inc.	11.47%	10.66%	10.13%	9.13%	10.47%	7.90%	9.95%	7.72%	9.74%	8.99%	8.75%	9.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STWD and QYLD in my portfolio?

STWD and QYLD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STWD or QYLD?

QYLD has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to STWD (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STWD dropped -66.34% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.