STT vs. GS
STT (State Street Corporation) and GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — STT in Asset Management, GS in Capital Markets. Over the past 10 years, STT returned 14.13%/yr vs 23.14%/yr for GS. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
STT vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STT achieves a 45.36% return, which is significantly higher than GS's 16.98% return. Over the past 10 years, STT has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 14.13%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 23.14% annualized return.
STT
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 42.38%
- YTD
- 45.36%
- 1Y
- 73.96%
- 3Y*
- 41.07%
- 5Y*
- 19.88%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.33%
GS
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- YTD
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 46.41%
- 3Y*
- 45.09%
- 5Y*
- 25.12%
- 10Y*
- 23.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.08B | $2.11B | $2.25B | |
| $374.32M | $453.15M | $386.42M |
STT vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STT State Street Corporation | 45.36% | 35.54% | 30.18% | 3.54% | -13.75% | 31.03% | -4.76% | 29.35% | -33.97% | 27.84% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 16.98% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 47.61% | 17.45% | 40.48% | -33.53% | 7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between STT and GS is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 1999 | 0.64 |
The correlation between STT and GS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
STT:
$50.97B
GS:
$300.43B
STT:
$12.10
GS:
$67.36
STT:
15.23
GS:
15.12
STT:
1.55
GS:
1.96
STT:
2.51
GS:
2.69
STT:
$21.00B
GS:
$117.94B
STT:
$15.00B
GS:
$67.57B
STT:
$4.94B
GS:
$31.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STT vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank
STT
GS
STT vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Corporation (STT) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STT | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.25 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.89 | 2.25 | +3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.11 | 6.94 | +11.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STT vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STT drawdown since its inception was -82.26%, roughly equal to the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STT and GS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STT | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.26% | -78.84% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.79% | -19.42% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.68% | -30.90% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.45% | -32.84% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.59% | -48.75% | -10.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -11.60% | +10.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.40% | -22.57% | +2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 6.30% | -2.47% |
Volatility
STT vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Corporation (STT) is 8.16%, while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a volatility of 14.38%. This indicates that STT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STT | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 14.38% | -6.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.56% | 26.02% | -7.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.79% | 31.51% | -6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.12% | 28.60% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.62% | 30.06% | +2.56% |
Dividends
STT vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
STT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than GS's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.67% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
STT State Street Corporation | 1.82% | 2.42% | 2.18% | 3.41% | 3.09% | 2.34% | 2.86% | 2.50% | 2.82% | 1.64% | 1.85% | 1.99% |
Financials
STT vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between State Street Corporation and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STT vs. GS - Profitability Comparison
STT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, State Street Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.05B and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
GS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.24B and revenue of 38.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.
STT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, State Street Corporation reported an operating income of 1.39B and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.
GS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.52B and revenue of 38.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.0%.
STT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, State Street Corporation reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 26.8%.
GS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 6.63B and revenue of 38.43B, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STT and GS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GS has higher volatility (14.38%) compared to STT (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STT dropped -82.26% vs GS's -78.84%.
STT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STT and GS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer