PortfoliosLab logo
STRS vs. CLLS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between STRS and CLLS is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

STRS vs. CLLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) and Cellectis S.A. (CLLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

STRS:

-0.34

CLLS:

-0.67

Sortino Ratio

STRS:

-0.12

CLLS:

-1.08

Omega Ratio

STRS:

0.99

CLLS:

0.89

Calmar Ratio

STRS:

-0.36

CLLS:

-0.49

Martin Ratio

STRS:

-0.80

CLLS:

-1.32

Ulcer Index

STRS:

27.65%

CLLS:

35.91%

Daily Std Dev

STRS:

63.42%

CLLS:

68.71%

Max Drawdown

STRS:

-87.61%

CLLS:

-97.96%

Current Drawdown

STRS:

-54.32%

CLLS:

-96.94%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STRS:

$146.52M

CLLS:

$152.98M

EPS

STRS:

-$0.71

CLLS:

-$0.67

PEG Ratio

STRS:

0.00

CLLS:

0.00

PS Ratio

STRS:

4.48

CLLS:

2.79

PB Ratio

STRS:

0.81

CLLS:

1.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

STRS:

$32.72M

CLLS:

$47.63M

Gross Profit (TTM)

STRS:

$3.28M

CLLS:

$30.34M

EBITDA (TTM)

STRS:

-$4.82M

CLLS:

-$25.68M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STRS achieves a -12.57% return, which is significantly higher than CLLS's -18.89% return. Over the past 10 years, STRS has outperformed CLLS with an annualized return of 3.73%, while CLLS has yielded a comparatively lower -28.60% annualized return.


STRS

YTD

-12.57%

1M

17.55%

6M

-29.51%

1Y

-23.90%

3Y*

-21.33%

5Y*

4.23%

10Y*

3.73%

CLLS

YTD

-18.89%

1M

-9.49%

6M

-30.48%

1Y

-46.13%

3Y*

-26.12%

5Y*

-39.80%

10Y*

-28.60%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Stratus Properties Inc.

Cellectis S.A.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

STRS vs. CLLS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STRS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of STRS is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of STRS is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of STRS is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of STRS is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of STRS is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of STRS is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CLLS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLLS is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLLS is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLLS is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLLS is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLLS is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLLS is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

STRS vs. CLLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) and Cellectis S.A. (CLLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current STRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is higher than the CLLS Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STRS and CLLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

STRS vs. CLLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither STRS nor CLLS has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
STRS
Stratus Properties Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%24.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.37%
CLLS
Cellectis S.A.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

STRS vs. CLLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STRS drawdown since its inception was -87.61%, smaller than the maximum CLLS drawdown of -97.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRS and CLLS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

STRS vs. CLLS - Volatility Comparison

Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) has a higher volatility of 23.42% compared to Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) at 15.41%. This indicates that STRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

STRS vs. CLLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stratus Properties Inc. and Cellectis S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M20212022202320242025
5.04M
10.66M
(STRS) Total Revenue
(CLLS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items