PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STRS vs. CLLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STRS vs. CLLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) and Cellectis S.A. (CLLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STRS achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly higher than CLLS's -34.92% return. Over the past 10 years, STRS has outperformed CLLS with an annualized return of 4.14%, while CLLS has yielded a comparatively lower -21.09% annualized return.


STRS

1D
-4.21%
1M
-10.21%
YTD
10.22%
6M
22.75%
1Y
41.91%
3Y*
5.90%
5Y*
3.64%
10Y*
4.14%

CLLS

1D
1.94%
1M
-16.22%
YTD
-34.92%
6M
-34.78%
1Y
120.28%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
-26.35%
10Y*
-21.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STRS vs. CLLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STRS
Stratus Properties Inc.
10.22%16.47%-28.07%49.61%-39.37%43.41%-17.69%29.19%-19.26%-5.95%
CLLS
Cellectis S.A.
-34.92%168.89%-41.56%46.67%-74.14%-69.99%58.06%2.82%-42.88%71.98%

Correlation

The correlation between STRS and CLLS is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2015

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STRS:

$214.67M

CLLS:

$316.66M

EPS

STRS:

$4.02

CLLS:

-$0.67

PS Ratio

STRS:

7.53

CLLS:

4.64

PB Ratio

STRS:

1.01

CLLS:

5.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

STRS:

$28.66M

CLLS:

$68.09M

Gross Profit (TTM)

STRS:

-$14.38M

CLLS:

$54.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

STRS:

$31.72M

CLLS:

-$55.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Stratus Properties Inc.

Cellectis S.A.

Often compared with STRS:
STRS vs. SPY
Often compared with CLLS:
CLLS vs. PNC

Return for Risk

STRS vs. CLLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STRS
STRS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
STRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
STRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

CLLS
CLLS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CLLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLLS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CLLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLLS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STRS vs. CLLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) and Cellectis S.A. (CLLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STRSCLLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.28

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

2.85

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.46

5.68

-1.22

STRS vs. CLLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STRS Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the CLLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STRS and CLLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STRSCLLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.29

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

-0.24

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

-0.24

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

-0.23

+0.35

Drawdowns

STRS vs. CLLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STRS drawdown since its inception was -87.61%, smaller than the maximum CLLS drawdown of -97.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRS and CLLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STRSCLLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.61%

-97.96%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.64%

-42.43%

+17.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.79%

-67.61%

+18.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.14%

-94.03%

+32.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.93%

-97.48%

+35.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.93%

-93.39%

+60.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.23%

-68.93%

+31.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.41%

21.24%

-11.83%

Volatility

STRS vs. CLLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) is 6.30%, while Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) has a volatility of 15.43%. This indicates that STRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STRSCLLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

15.43%

-9.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.18%

50.24%

-23.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.15%

94.07%

-45.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.90%

109.65%

-61.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.59%

89.10%

-37.51%

Dividends

STRS vs. CLLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither STRS nor CLLS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLLS
Cellectis S.A.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STRS
Stratus Properties Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%24.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.37%

Financials

STRS vs. CLLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stratus Properties Inc. and Cellectis S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M20222023202420252026
3.79M
5.80M
(STRS) Total Revenue
(CLLS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


STRS and CLLS have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLLS has higher volatility (15.43%) compared to STRS (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRS dropped -87.61% vs CLLS's -97.96%.

CLLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STRS and CLLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer