STRL vs. TAYD
Compare and contrast key facts about Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) and Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: STRL or TAYD.
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and TAYD is 0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
STRL vs. TAYD - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
STRL:
41.16%
TAYD:
47.45%
STRL:
-1.06%
TAYD:
-1.44%
STRL:
-1.06%
TAYD:
0.00%
Fundamentals
STRL:
$5.41B
TAYD:
$116.15M
STRL:
$8.55
TAYD:
$2.50
STRL:
20.79
TAYD:
14.81
STRL:
1.54
TAYD:
0.00
STRL:
2.57
TAYD:
2.71
STRL:
6.71
TAYD:
2.01
STRL:
$2.11B
TAYD:
$38.13M
STRL:
$439.78M
TAYD:
$19.81M
STRL:
$437.53M
TAYD:
$9.68M
Returns By Period
STRL
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
TAYD
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
STRL vs. TAYD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
STRL
TAYD
STRL vs. TAYD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) and Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
STRL vs. TAYD - Dividend Comparison
Neither STRL nor TAYD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
STRL vs. TAYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -1.06%, smaller than the maximum TAYD drawdown of -1.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and TAYD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
STRL vs. TAYD - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...
Financials
STRL vs. TAYD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Construction Company, Inc. and Taylor Devices, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STRL vs. TAYD - Profitability Comparison
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 94.84M and revenue of 430.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.
TAYD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Taylor Devices, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.53M and revenue of 10.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.08M and revenue of 430.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.
TAYD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Taylor Devices, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.02M and revenue of 10.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a net income of 39.48M and revenue of 430.95M, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.
TAYD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Taylor Devices, Inc. reported a net income of 2.00M and revenue of 10.56M, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.