PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STPZ vs. FXAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STPZ vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STPZ achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's 9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, STPZ has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 2.78%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.80% annualized return.


STPZ

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.22%
1Y
3.26%
3Y*
4.81%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
2.78%

FXAIX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.10%
YTD
9.79%
6M
8.79%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
13.60%
10Y*
15.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STPZ vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STPZ
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
1.01%6.40%4.30%4.28%-4.49%5.64%5.44%4.83%0.04%0.51%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
9.79%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between STPZ and FXAIX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2011

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STPZ vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STPZ
STPZ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
STPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
STPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
STPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
STPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STPZ vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STPZFXAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.02

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

13.62

-2.86

STPZ vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STPZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STPZ and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STPZ vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STPZ drawdown since its inception was -6.77%, smaller than the maximum FXAIX drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STPZ and FXAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STPZFXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-33.79%

+27.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.93%

-8.89%

+7.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.35%

-18.76%

+17.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.70%

-24.50%

+17.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.77%

-33.79%

+27.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-1.72%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-3.79%

+2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

1.97%

-1.67%

Volatility

STPZ vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) is 0.82%, while Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that STPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STPZFXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

4.68%

-3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.39%

9.84%

-8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95%

12.50%

-10.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.29%

17.00%

-13.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.99%

18.12%

-15.13%

STPZ vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

STPZ vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

STPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than FXAIX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.04%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%
STPZ
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
4.14%3.65%1.97%1.63%5.88%3.65%1.86%1.76%2.23%1.51%0.65%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


STPZ and FXAIX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXAIX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to STPZ (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STPZ dropped -6.77% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STPZ and FXAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer