STLG vs. SCHD
STLG (iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, STLG returned 18.36%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for SCHD. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STLG charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
STLG vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STLG achieves a 16.17% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return.
STLG
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 16.17%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- 1Y
- 36.49%
- 3Y*
- 30.82%
- 5Y*
- 18.36%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
STLG vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 16.17% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.72% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 13.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between STLG and SCHD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between STLG and SCHD has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
STLG vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STLG
SCHD
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
STLG
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
STLG
SCHD
Healthcare
STLG
SCHD
Communication Services
STLG
SCHD
Industrials
STLG
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
STLG
SCHD
Financial Services
STLG
SCHD
Utilities
STLG
SCHD
Energy
STLG
SCHD
Basic Materials
STLG
SCHD
Real Estate
STLG
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STLG vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
STLG
SCHD
STLG vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STLG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.40 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 5.35 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.39 | 12.94 | -2.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STLG vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STLG drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLG and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STLG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -33.37% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -4.61% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -16.13% | -7.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -16.85% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.93% | -2.47% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -3.31% | -4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 1.90% | +1.62% |
Volatility
STLG vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that STLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STLG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.62% | 3.58% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.52% | 7.73% | +7.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 11.07% | +8.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 14.36% | +7.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 16.71% | +7.27% |
STLG vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
STLG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STLG vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
STLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than SCHD's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STLG and SCHD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STLG has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLG dropped -31.34% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, STLG leads with 18.36% vs 8.71% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, STLG has performed better with a 18.36% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for STLG.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.27% for STLG.
STLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. STLG tracks Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for STLG and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STLG and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer