STIP vs. BNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX).
STIP and BNDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. STIP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). It was launched on Dec 1, 2010. BNDX is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Float-Adjusted Index (Hedged). It was launched on May 31, 2013. Both STIP and BNDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: STIP or BNDX.
Performance
STIP vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STIP achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 3.15% return. Over the past 10 years, STIP has outperformed BNDX with an annualized return of 2.38%, while BNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.03% annualized return.
STIP
4.40%
-0.30%
2.89%
6.03%
3.49%
2.38%
BNDX
3.15%
-0.36%
3.75%
7.27%
-0.01%
2.03%
Key characteristics
STIP | BNDX | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 3.04 | 1.89 |
Sortino Ratio | 5.08 | 2.86 |
Omega Ratio | 1.67 | 1.33 |
Calmar Ratio | 4.49 | 0.70 |
Martin Ratio | 23.03 | 6.87 |
Ulcer Index | 0.27% | 1.14% |
Daily Std Dev | 2.03% | 4.13% |
Max Drawdown | -5.50% | -16.23% |
Current Drawdown | -0.63% | -4.45% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STIP vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STIP has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between STIP and BNDX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
STIP vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
STIP vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison
STIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than BNDX's 4.77% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 2.46% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.43% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.75% | 0.31% |
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.77% | 4.42% | 1.52% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.54% | 0.86% |
Drawdowns
STIP vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STIP drawdown since its inception was -5.50%, smaller than the maximum BNDX drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STIP and BNDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
STIP vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) is 0.48%, while Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that STIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.