PortfoliosLab logo
STC vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between STC and ET is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

STC vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stewart Information Services Corporation (STC) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

STC:

0.24

ET:

0.82

Sortino Ratio

STC:

0.49

ET:

1.22

Omega Ratio

STC:

1.05

ET:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

STC:

0.24

ET:

0.89

Martin Ratio

STC:

0.60

ET:

2.87

Ulcer Index

STC:

8.83%

ET:

7.60%

Daily Std Dev

STC:

27.83%

ET:

27.54%

Max Drawdown

STC:

-87.50%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

STC:

-14.12%

ET:

-11.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STC:

$1.81B

ET:

$59.85B

EPS

STC:

$2.61

ET:

$1.32

PE Ratio

STC:

24.80

ET:

13.21

PEG Ratio

STC:

3.04

ET:

0.75

PS Ratio

STC:

0.71

ET:

0.73

PB Ratio

STC:

1.29

ET:

1.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

STC:

$598.21B

ET:

$82.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STC:

$290.27B

ET:

$14.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

STC:

$18.08B

ET:

$13.56B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STC achieves a -2.45% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -4.83% return. Over the past 10 years, STC has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 9.34%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.90% annualized return.


STC

YTD

-2.45%

1M

0.45%

6M

-8.41%

1Y

6.73%

5Y*

22.01%

10Y*

9.34%

ET

YTD

-4.83%

1M

12.35%

6M

9.35%

1Y

22.49%

5Y*

32.09%

10Y*

1.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

STC vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of STC is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of STC is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of STC is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of STC is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of STC is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of STC is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

STC vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stewart Information Services Corporation (STC) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current STC Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STC and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

STC vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

STC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than ET's 7.20% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
STC
Stewart Information Services Corporation
3.02%2.89%3.15%3.86%1.71%2.48%2.94%2.90%2.84%2.60%2.14%0.27%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.20%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

STC vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STC drawdown since its inception was -87.50%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STC and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

STC vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stewart Information Services Corporation (STC) is 6.98%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 11.89%. This indicates that STC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

STC vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stewart Information Services Corporation and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B500.00B600.00B20212022202320242025
596.28B
21.02B
(STC) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

STC vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stewart Information Services Corporation and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
19.4%
(STC) Gross Margin
(ET) Gross Margin
STC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Stewart Information Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 596.28B and revenue of 596.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.

STC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Stewart Information Services Corporation reported an operating income of 2.59B and revenue of 596.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

STC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Stewart Information Services Corporation reported a net income of 3.08B and revenue of 596.28B, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.