STAA vs. META

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META).

Performance

STAA vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

STAA vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
STAA STAAR Surgical Company	-19.01%	-4.94%	-22.17%	-35.70%	-46.83%	15.25%	125.25%	10.22%	105.87%	42.86%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-13.25%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap STAA : $926.92M META : $1.47T
EPS STAA : -$1.62 META : $23.51
PS Ratio STAA : 3.87 META : 7.32
PB Ratio STAA : 2.69K META : 6.78
Total Revenue (TTM) STAA : $239.44M META : $200.97B
Gross Profit (TTM) STAA : $182.42M META : $164.79B
EBITDA (TTM) STAA : -$91.71M META : $104.55B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STAA achieves a -19.01% return, which is significantly lower than META's -13.25% return. Over the past 10 years, STAA has underperformed META with an annualized return of 9.76%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.

STAA

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: -6.03%
• YTD: -19.01%
• 6M: -30.41%
• 1Y: 6.07%
• 3Y*: -33.63%
• 5Y*: -29.29%
• 10Y*: 9.76%

META

• 1D: 6.67%
• 1M: -11.66%
• YTD: -13.25%
• 6M: -21.96%
• 1Y: -0.42%
• 3Y*: 39.60%
• 5Y*: 14.06%
• 10Y*: 17.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

STAA vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STAA

STAA Risk / Return Rank: 46
STAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
STAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
STAA Omega Ratio Rank: 47
STAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
STAA Martin Ratio Rank: 45

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 40
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
META Omega Ratio Rank: 37
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
META Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STAA vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STAA	META	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	-0.01	+0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	0.29	+0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.04	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.12	-0.01	+0.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.27	-0.04	+0.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STAA vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STAA Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STAA and META, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STAA	META	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09	-0.01	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.47	0.32	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17	0.45	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.55	-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between STAA and META is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

STAA vs. META - Dividend Comparison

STAA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.

	TTM	2025	2024
STAA STAAR Surgical Company	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.37%	0.32%	0.34%

Drawdowns

STAA vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STAA drawdown since its inception was -95.62%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STAA and META.

Drawdown Indicators

	STAA	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.62%	-76.74%	-18.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.65%	-33.30%	-10.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.72%	-76.74%	-13.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.72%	-76.74%	-13.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.51%	-27.41%	-61.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.51%	-15.19%	-38.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.72%	13.13%	+5.59%

Volatility

STAA vs. META - Volatility Comparison

STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) has a higher volatility of 15.44% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 13.64%. This indicates that STAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STAA	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.44%	13.64%	+1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.21%	26.73%	+10.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.08%	39.91%	+27.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.94%	43.77%	+18.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.57%	38.46%	+20.11%

Financials

STAA vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between STAAR Surgical Company and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

STAA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, STAAR Surgical Company reported a gross profit of 43.74M and revenue of 57.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.7%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.99B and revenue of 59.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.8%.

STAA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, STAAR Surgical Company reported an operating income of -22.84M and revenue of 57.80M, resulting in an operating margin of -39.5%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.75B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.3%.

STAA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, STAAR Surgical Company reported a net income of -18.31M and revenue of 57.80M, resulting in a net margin of -31.7%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 22.77B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.0%.