PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSP vs. TEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SSP vs. TEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The E.W. Scripps Company (SSP) and Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSP achieves a -29.32% return, which is significantly lower than TEO's 13.61% return. Over the past 10 years, SSP has underperformed TEO with an annualized return of -15.71%, while TEO has yielded a comparatively higher 1.45% annualized return.


SSP

1D
2.55%
1M
-17.54%
YTD
-29.32%
6M
-30.54%
1Y
-9.62%
3Y*
-29.00%
5Y*
-32.49%
10Y*
-15.71%

TEO

1D
-4.07%
1M
11.21%
YTD
13.61%
6M
17.35%
1Y
47.98%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
22.44%
10Y*
1.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSP vs. TEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSP
The E.W. Scripps Company
-29.32%80.54%-72.34%-39.42%-31.83%26.55%-0.66%1.12%1.97%-19.14%
TEO
Telecom Argentina S.A.
13.61%-7.40%79.33%37.87%6.86%-15.34%-39.38%-17.25%-54.46%108.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SSP and TEO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 1994

0.17

The correlation between SSP and TEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SSP:

$253.14M

TEO:

$5.68B

EPS

SSP:

-$1.30

TEO:

ARS 875.85

PS Ratio

SSP:

0.12

TEO:

0.92

PB Ratio

SSP:

0.31

TEO:

1.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

SSP:

$2.14B

TEO:

ARS 9.04T

Gross Profit (TTM)

SSP:

$724.07M

TEO:

ARS 6.85T

EBITDA (TTM)

SSP:

$178.56M

TEO:

ARS 3.30T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSP vs. TEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSP
SSP Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSP Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

TEO
TEO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSP vs. TEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The E.W. Scripps Company (SSP) and Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSPTEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.19

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

1.26

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

3.11

-3.46

SSP vs. TEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSP Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the TEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSP and TEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSP vs. TEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSP drawdown since its inception was -96.38%, roughly equal to the maximum TEO drawdown of -98.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSP and TEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSPTEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.38%

-98.60%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.60%

-38.26%

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.97%

-54.02%

-32.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.00%

-54.02%

-39.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.20%

-86.58%

-7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.23%

-50.22%

-39.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.66%

-53.79%

+24.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.29%

15.49%

+11.80%

Volatility

SSP vs. TEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The E.W. Scripps Company (SSP) is 17.23%, while Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO) has a volatility of 21.92%. This indicates that SSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSPTEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.23%

21.92%

-4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.70%

38.29%

+11.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.71%

66.57%

+18.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.83%

54.44%

+28.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.99%

50.09%

+19.90%

Dividends

SSP vs. TEO - Dividend Comparison

SSP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSP
The E.W. Scripps Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.31%1.27%1.27%0.00%0.00%5.42%
TEO
Telecom Argentina S.A.
0.37%0.42%1.91%3.43%0.00%8.90%5.27%12.36%15.08%3.33%3.57%5.28%

Financials

SSP vs. TEO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The E.W. Scripps Company and Telecom Argentina S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00B1.00T1.50T2.00T2.50T20222023202420252026
516.87M
2.36T
(SSP) Total Revenue
(TEO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SSP values in USD, TEO values in ARS

SSP vs. TEO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The E.W. Scripps Company and Telecom Argentina S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
39.9%
76.4%
Portfolio components
SSP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The E.W. Scripps Company reported a gross profit of 206.07M and revenue of 516.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.

TEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telecom Argentina S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.80T and revenue of 2.36T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.4%.

SSP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The E.W. Scripps Company reported an operating income of 24.77M and revenue of 516.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

TEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telecom Argentina S.A. reported an operating income of 823.75B and revenue of 2.36T, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.

SSP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The E.W. Scripps Company reported a net income of -17.98M and revenue of 516.87M, resulting in a net margin of -3.5%.

TEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telecom Argentina S.A. reported a net income of 636.68B and revenue of 2.36T, resulting in a net margin of 27.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SSP and TEO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEO has higher volatility (21.92%) compared to SSP (17.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSP dropped -96.38% vs TEO's -98.60%.

TEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSP and TEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer