SSLN.L vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK).
SSLN.L and XLK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SSLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Silver. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both SSLN.L and XLK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SSLN.L or XLK.
Key characteristics
| SSLN.L | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 30.35% | 23.99% |
| 1Y Return | 31.16% | 36.08% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.47% | 13.22% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.70% | 23.70% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.30% | 20.80% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.08 | 1.69 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.63 | 2.23 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.20 | 1.30 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.69 | 2.17 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.77 | 7.51 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.00% | 4.91% |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.88% | 21.79% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.95% | -82.05% |
| Current Drawdown | -21.59% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and XLK is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a 30.35% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 23.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 9.30%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 20.80% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSLN.L vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SSLN.L vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% | 1.75% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a higher volatility of 9.80% compared to Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) at 6.28%. This indicates that SSLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.