SSAC.L vs. VWRL.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L).
SSAC.L and VWRL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SSAC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011. VWRL.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2012. Both SSAC.L and VWRL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SSAC.L or VWRL.L.
Key characteristics
| SSAC.L | VWRL.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.32% | 11.24% |
| 1Y Return | 15.75% | 15.57% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.73% | 7.93% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.02% | 10.38% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.02% | 11.76% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.57 | 1.61 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.36% | 10.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.43% | -24.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.62% | -1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSAC.L and VWRL.L is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SSAC.L vs. VWRL.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SSAC.L having a 11.32% return and VWRL.L slightly lower at 11.24%. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L has underperformed VWRL.L with an annualized return of 11.02%, while VWRL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.76% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSAC.L vs. VWRL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRL.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SSAC.L vs. VWRL.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SSAC.L vs. VWRL.L - Dividend Comparison
SSAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VWRL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.20% | 1.73% | 2.04% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.95% | 2.23% | 1.90% | 1.85% | 1.98% | 2.14% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
SSAC.L vs. VWRL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, roughly equal to the maximum VWRL.L drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and VWRL.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SSAC.L vs. VWRL.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) at 3.75%. This indicates that SSAC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.