SRVR vs. AMT
SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) is REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index, while AMT (American Tower Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, SRVR returned -0.81%/yr vs -4.38%/yr for AMT. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SRVR vs. AMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than AMT's 4.84% return.
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 20.69%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- —
AMT
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- -11.45%
- 3Y*
- 1.89%
- 5Y*
- -4.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
SRVR vs. AMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 19.79% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 11.99% | 41.98% | -3.51% |
AMT American Tower Corporation | 4.84% | -0.92% | -12.16% | 5.37% | -25.67% | 32.89% | -0.48% | 47.87% | 17.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRVR and AMT is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SRVR and AMT has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRVR vs. AMT — Risk / Return Rank
SRVR
AMT
SRVR vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRVR | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.94 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | -0.43 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | -0.63 | +2.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRVR | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | -0.50 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | -0.17 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.20 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
SRVR vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and AMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRVR | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.99% | -98.70% | +57.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.78% | -26.67% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.34% | -27.54% | +9.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | -45.34% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.28% | -30.49% | +18.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.27% | -27.02% | +11.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.83% | 18.22% | -11.39% |
Volatility
SRVR vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) is 5.47%, while American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that SRVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRVR | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 7.26% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.12% | 18.40% | -5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 23.21% | -6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 26.23% | -6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 26.12% | -4.68% |
Dividends
SRVR vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison
SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than AMT's 3.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMT American Tower Corporation | 3.78% | 3.87% | 3.53% | 2.99% | 2.77% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 1.87% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.70% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRVR and AMT have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMT has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to SRVR (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRVR dropped -40.99% vs AMT's -98.70%.
SRVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRVR and AMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer