SQY vs. TSLY
SQY (YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF) and TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SQY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while TSLY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SQY returned 7.17% vs 24.96% for TSLY. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SQY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSLY.
Performance
SQY vs. TSLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQY achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly higher than TSLY's -1.77% return.
SQY
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 4.45%
- 6M
- 14.28%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLY
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 24.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SQY vs. TSLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | 4.45% | -29.43% | 21.72% | 44.45% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -1.77% | 13.62% | 27.83% | -5.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQY and TSLY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQY vs. TSLY — Risk / Return Rank
SQY
TSLY
SQY vs. TSLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SQY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.19 | 0.66 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.51 | 1.07 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.14 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 1.12 | -0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | 2.66 | -2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 0.66 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.30 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
SQY vs. TSLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQY drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, which is greater than TSLY's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQY and TSLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.30% | -49.52% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.72% | -21.64% | -16.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.42% | -8.16% | -26.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.80% | -20.01% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.14% | 9.08% | +8.06% |
Volatility
SQY vs. TSLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) is 9.38%, while YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that SQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 9.96% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.72% | 22.38% | +8.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.47% | 38.19% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.11% | 45.53% | -3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.11% | 45.53% | -3.42% |
SQY vs. TSLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQY vs. TSLY - Dividend Comparison
SQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 103.71%, more than TSLY's 83.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | 103.71% | 95.35% | 62.54% | 9.85% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 83.88% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQY and TSLY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLY has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to SQY (9.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQY dropped -52.30% vs TSLY's -49.52%.
On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 24.96% vs 7.17% for SQY. On fees, TSLY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, SQY has been the lower-risk option at 9.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 24.96% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SQY.
SQY has the higher dividend yield at 103.71%, compared with 83.88% for TSLY.
SQY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 0.99% for TSLY.
TSLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQY and TSLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer