SPYT.DE vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI Europe Communication Services UCITS ETF (SPYT.DE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
SPYT.DE and QYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPYT.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe Communication Services 20/35 Capped. It was launched on Dec 5, 2014. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013. Both SPYT.DE and QYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPYT.DE or QYLD.
Key characteristics
SPYT.DE | QYLD | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 14.32% | 18.13% |
1Y Return | 18.78% | 22.51% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 4.66% | 5.36% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 2.74% | 7.69% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 1.12% | 8.45% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.95 | 2.25 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.64 | 3.09 |
Omega Ratio | 1.35 | 1.55 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.71 | 2.92 |
Martin Ratio | 10.82 | 16.08 |
Ulcer Index | 1.73% | 1.41% |
Daily Std Dev | 9.61% | 10.05% |
Max Drawdown | -49.63% | -24.89% |
Current Drawdown | -13.05% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYT.DE and QYLD is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SPYT.DE vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SPYT.DE achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 18.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYT.DE has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 1.12%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.45% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPYT.DE vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYT.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPYT.DE vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Communication Services UCITS ETF (SPYT.DE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPYT.DE vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
SPYT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.24%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDR MSCI Europe Communication Services UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.24% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% | 10.74% |
Drawdowns
SPYT.DE vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYT.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.63%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYT.DE and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPYT.DE vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Europe Communication Services UCITS ETF (SPYT.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 2.54%. This indicates that SPYT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.