PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYM.DE vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYM.DE vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPYM.DE is traded in EUR, while IEMG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IEMG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM.DE achieves a 28.91% return, which is significantly higher than IEMG's 27.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPYM.DE having a 10.32% annualized return and IEMG not far behind at 10.28%.


SPYM.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
2.41%
YTD
28.91%
6M
30.74%
1Y
48.17%
3Y*
22.17%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
10.32%

IEMG

1D
0.82%
1M
1.42%
YTD
27.35%
6M
28.23%
1Y
45.12%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYM.DE vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYM.DE
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
28.91%19.06%14.05%6.05%-14.90%5.28%6.27%22.31%-11.26%19.74%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
27.35%16.83%13.53%8.18%-15.02%6.79%8.15%20.48%-10.93%20.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM.DE and IEMG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.79

The correlation between SPYM.DE and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYM.DE vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYM.DE
SPYM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SPYM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYM.DE vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYM.DEIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.42

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

4.29

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.65

14.72

+0.93

SPYM.DE vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM.DE and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYM.DE vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM.DE and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYM.DEIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.83%

-34.49%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-10.58%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.95%

-17.88%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.86%

-22.55%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.69%

-32.63%

+0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.14%

-3.95%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-9.15%

-8.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

3.07%

0.00%

Volatility

SPYM.DE vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE) is 8.92%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.99%. This indicates that SPYM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYM.DEIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.92%

10.99%

-2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.12%

18.42%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.43%

20.56%

-1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

17.26%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.51%

19.39%

-0.88%

SPYM.DE vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYM.DE vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

SPYM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.19%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
SPYM.DE
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYM.DE and IEMG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for SPYM.DE.

SPYM.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. SPYM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SPYM.DE and 0.09% for IEMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYM.DE and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer