SPXU vs. SPYG
SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPXU tracks the S&P 500 Index (-300%) while SPYG tracks the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXU returned -41.98%/yr vs 18.05%/yr for SPYG. At a correlation of -0.95, they often move in opposite directions. SPXU charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
SPXU vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXU achieves a -20.19% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXU has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of -41.98%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.05% annualized return.
SPXU
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- -20.19%
- 6M
- -17.81%
- 1Y
- -43.92%
- 3Y*
- -40.85%
- 5Y*
- -33.55%
- 10Y*
- -41.98%
SPYG
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 26.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.05%
SPXU vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -20.19% | -41.73% | -43.31% | -46.02% | 36.05% | -57.94% | -70.39% | -56.27% | 3.97% | -44.23% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXU and SPYG is -0.94, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009 | -0.95 |
The correlation between SPXU and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.95 to -0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXU vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXU
SPYG
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SPXU
SPYG
Basic Materials
SPXU
-
SPYG
Communication Services
SPXU
-
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
SPXU
-
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
SPXU
-
SPYG
Energy
SPXU
-
SPYG
Healthcare
SPXU
-
SPYG
Industrials
SPXU
-
SPYG
Real Estate
SPXU
-
SPYG
Technology
SPXU
-
SPYG
Utilities
SPXU
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXU vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
SPXU
SPYG
SPXU vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXU | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.28 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 1.96 | -2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.61 | 7.79 | -9.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXU vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than SPYG's maximum drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXU | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -67.63% | -32.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.11% | -13.76% | -33.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.36% | -22.14% | -62.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | -32.67% | -57.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.63% | -32.67% | -66.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -5.52% | -94.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.33% | -24.28% | -69.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.37% | 3.46% | +25.91% |
Volatility
SPXU vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a higher volatility of 14.32% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 7.26%. This indicates that SPXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXU | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.32% | 7.26% | +7.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.53% | 13.90% | +15.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.35% | 17.26% | +20.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 21.36% | +29.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.43% | 20.73% | +32.70% |
SPXU vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXU has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXU vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.35% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXU and SPYG have a correlation of -0.94, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXU has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to SPYG (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXU dropped -99.99% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.05% vs -41.98% for SPXU. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.05% return vs -41.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPXU.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.35%, compared with 0.50% for SPYG.
SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%), while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SPXU and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXU and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer