SPXT vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPXT (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPXT tracks the S&P 500 Ex-Information Technology Index while XLG tracks the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXT returned 11.34%/yr vs 17.27%/yr for XLG. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

SPXT vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXT achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 7.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXT has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 11.34%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.27% annualized return.

SPXT

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -1.41%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 3.39%
• 1Y: 15.02%
• 3Y*: 16.34%
• 5Y*: 9.16%
• 10Y*: 11.34%

XLG

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 4.22%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 28.54%
• 3Y*: 24.46%
• 5Y*: 16.24%
• 10Y*: 17.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXT vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPXT ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF	2.70%	15.10%	19.93%	16.23%	-14.24%	26.36%	10.44%	26.88%	-7.06%	16.99%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	7.57%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXT and XLG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015	0.70

The correlation between SPXT and XLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXT vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPXT	XLG
Financial Services	18.0%	9.6%
Communication Services	17.0%	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	15.9%	11.3%
Healthcare	13.5%	7.0%
Industrials	12.2%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	7.3%	5.8%
Energy	5.1%	2.7%
Utilities	4.1%	-
Real Estate	2.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.8%	0.6%
Technology	1.0%	43.9%

Return for Risk

SPXT vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXT

SPXT Risk / Return Rank: 41
SPXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SPXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SPXT Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SPXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
SPXT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 56
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXT vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPXT	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	2.15	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	2.92	-0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.38	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	2.31	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.32	8.66	-0.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPXT vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXT and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPXT	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	2.15	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.87	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.92	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.62	+0.10

Drawdowns

SPXT vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXT drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXT and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPXT	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.38%	-52.39%	+18.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.90%	-12.41%	+4.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.58%	-20.70%	+5.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.47%	-28.02%	+6.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.38%	-30.46%	-3.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	-1.44%	-1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.14%	-7.64%	+3.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	3.30%	-1.49%

Volatility

SPXT vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) is 2.57%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that SPXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPXT	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.57%	3.19%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.53%	9.80%	-2.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.34%	13.33%	-2.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.71%	18.68%	-3.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.23%	18.84%	-2.61%

SPXT vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPXT vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

SPXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPXT ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF	1.39%	1.38%	1.29%	1.53%	1.86%	1.15%	1.63%	1.63%	2.03%	1.55%	2.67%	0.56%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPXT and XLG in my portfolio?

SPXT and XLG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPXT or XLG?

XLG has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to SPXT (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXT dropped -34.38% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, SPXT or XLG?

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.27% vs 11.34% for SPXT. On fees, SPXT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXT has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPXT or XLG?

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.27% return vs 11.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPXT or XLG?

SPXT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPXT or XLG?

SPXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.

What is the main difference between SPXT and XLG?

SPXT tracks S&P 500 Ex-Information Technology Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXT and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.