PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXT vs. ES=F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPXT vs. ES=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and E-mini S&P 500 Futures (ES=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXT achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than ES=F's 8.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXT has underperformed ES=F with an annualized return of 11.57%, while ES=F has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.


SPXT

1D
1.54%
1M
0.49%
6M
4.22%
YTD
7.11%
1Y
17.67%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
11.57%
ALL TIME*
11.84%

ES=F

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.33%
6M
7.72%
YTD
8.86%
1Y
19.78%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
13.30%
ALL TIME*
6.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.43B$10.70B$11.35B
$2.23M$2.29M$2.05M

SPXT vs. ES=F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
7.11%15.10%19.93%16.23%-14.24%26.36%10.44%26.88%-7.06%16.99%
ES=F
E-mini S&P 500 Futures
8.86%16.12%23.15%24.84%-18.86%26.94%16.02%28.97%-6.38%19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXT and ES=F is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.76

The correlation between SPXT and ES=F shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXT vs. ES=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPXT
SPXT Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXT Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ES=F
ES=F Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
ES=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ES=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
ES=F Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
ES=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
ES=F Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPXT vs. ES=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and E-mini S&P 500 Futures (ES=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXTES=FDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

1.99

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.80

8.20

+0.60

SPXT vs. ES=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the ES=F Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXT and ES=F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXT vs. ES=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXT drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, smaller than the maximum ES=F drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXT and ES=F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXTES=FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.38%

-57.11%

+22.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-8.95%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-18.54%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

-25.02%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.38%

-34.45%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-1.58%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-12.63%

+8.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.17%

-0.33%

Volatility

SPXT vs. ES=F - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and E-mini S&P 500 Futures (ES=F) have volatilities of 3.59% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXTES=FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

3.50%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

9.88%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83%

12.85%

-2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

17.09%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

18.08%

-1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXT and ES=F have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPXT has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to ES=F (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXT dropped -34.38% vs ES=F's -57.11%.

SPXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXT and ES=F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer