SPXP.L vs. ^GSPC
SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, SPXP.L returned 16.32%/yr vs 14.55%/yr for ^GSPC. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SPXP.L vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPXP.L is traded in GBp, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPXP.L having a 10.55% return and ^GSPC slightly higher at 10.75%. Over the past 10 years, SPXP.L has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 16.32%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 14.55% annualized return.
SPXP.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
^GSPC
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 27.40%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 14.55%
SPXP.L vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 10.75% | 8.10% | 25.46% | 18.02% | -9.86% | 28.09% | 12.84% | 23.98% | -0.68% | 9.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXP.L and ^GSPC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.52 |
The correlation between SPXP.L and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXP.L vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
SPXP.L
^GSPC
SPXP.L vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXP.L | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.45 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 3.43 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.14 | 12.79 | +2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXP.L | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 2.38 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.86 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.10 | 0.80 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.58 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
SPXP.L vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -37.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXP.L and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXP.L | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -37.07% | +11.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -8.03% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -22.15% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -22.15% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.46% | -26.01% | +0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.47% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -5.32% | +1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 2.15% | -0.22% |
Volatility
SPXP.L vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) have volatilities of 2.64% and 2.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXP.L | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 2.76% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | 8.23% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.56% | 11.56% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 15.86% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 18.16% | -1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXP.L and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SPXP.L and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer