PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXN vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXN vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXN achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXN has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 15.36%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.76% annualized return.


SPXN

1D
1.03%
1M
0.11%
6M
8.86%
YTD
10.87%
1Y
23.16%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
15.36%
ALL TIME*
15.61%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M
$140.29K$126.21K$146.15K

SPXN vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
10.87%18.74%24.35%28.57%-18.87%27.04%22.15%31.50%-3.85%20.84%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.03%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXN and SCHD is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between SPXN and SCHD has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPXN vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXN
SCHD

Technology

44.4%
12.7%

Communication Services

11.4%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
7.7%

Healthcare

10.3%
20.8%

Industrials

9.8%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
20.6%

Energy

3.5%
14.1%

Utilities

2.5%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.2%

Financial Services

-

9.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

SPXN
44.4%
SCHD
12.7%

Communication Services

SPXN
11.4%
SCHD
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXN
11.0%
SCHD
7.7%

Healthcare

SPXN
10.3%
SCHD
20.8%

Industrials

SPXN
9.8%
SCHD
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPXN
5.2%
SCHD
20.6%

Energy

SPXN
3.5%
SCHD
14.1%

Utilities

SPXN
2.5%
SCHD
0.1%

Basic Materials

SPXN
1.9%
SCHD
1.2%

Financial Services

SPXN

-

SCHD
9.9%

Real Estate

SPXN

-

SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXN vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPXN
SPXN Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPXN vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXNSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.51

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

6.74

-4.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.92

17.01

-8.09

SPXN vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXN and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXN vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXNSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.10%

-33.37%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.26%

-4.61%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-16.13%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.47%

-16.85%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.10%

-33.37%

+1.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

-1.24%

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-3.30%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

1.82%

+0.58%

Volatility

SPXN vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 3.93% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXNSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

4.11%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

8.11%

+2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.95%

11.13%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

14.39%

+2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

16.72%

+0.97%

SPXN vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXN vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than SCHD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
0.91%0.98%1.12%1.19%1.35%0.94%1.09%1.41%1.76%1.54%2.60%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXN and SCHD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to SPXN (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXN dropped -32.10% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SPXN leads with 15.36% vs 12.76% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SPXN has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXN has performed better with a 15.36% return vs 12.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPXN.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.91% for SPXN.

SPXN is categorized as S&P 500, while SCHD is Dividend. SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXN and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXN and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer