PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXL vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXL vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 28.14% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXL has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 30.20%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 18.77% annualized return.


SPXL

1D
-2.08%
1M
14.77%
YTD
28.14%
6M
26.88%
1Y
81.54%
3Y*
52.83%
5Y*
23.51%
10Y*
30.20%

SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXL vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF
28.14%31.94%63.61%69.49%-56.55%98.75%9.64%102.80%-25.11%71.03%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXL and SCHG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.95

The correlation between SPXL and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPXL vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXL
SCHG

Technology

8.5%
46.3%

Financial Services

2.6%
6.7%

Communication Services

2.4%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
12.7%

Healthcare

1.9%
7.7%

Industrials

1.7%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
1.7%

Energy

0.8%
0.8%

Utilities

0.6%
0.4%

Real Estate

0.4%
0.5%

Basic Materials

0.4%
1.4%

Technology

SPXL
8.5%
SCHG
46.3%

Financial Services

SPXL
2.6%
SCHG
6.7%

Communication Services

SPXL
2.4%
SCHG
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXL
2.2%
SCHG
12.7%

Healthcare

SPXL
1.9%
SCHG
7.7%

Industrials

SPXL
1.7%
SCHG
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPXL
1.1%
SCHG
1.7%

Energy

SPXL
0.8%
SCHG
0.8%

Utilities

SPXL
0.6%
SCHG
0.4%

Real Estate

SPXL
0.4%
SCHG
0.5%

Basic Materials

SPXL
0.4%
SCHG
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXL vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXL
SPXL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXL Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXL vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXLSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

1.51

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.94

5.04

+7.89

SPXL vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXL Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXL and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXLSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.60

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.70

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.87

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.84

-0.32

Drawdowns

SPXL vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXLSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.86%

-34.59%

-42.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.77%

-16.41%

-10.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.95%

-23.39%

-25.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.80%

-34.59%

-29.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.86%

-34.59%

-42.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-1.78%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.72%

-5.20%

-10.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.32%

4.90%

+1.42%

Volatility

SPXL vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that SPXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXLSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.49%

3.61%

+4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.67%

11.62%

+15.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.39%

15.50%

+19.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.24%

22.27%

+27.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.42%

21.55%

+31.87%

SPXL vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXL vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SPXL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF
0.52%0.69%0.74%0.98%0.32%0.11%0.22%0.84%1.02%3.88%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SPXL and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPXL has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXL dropped -76.86% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 30.20% vs 18.77% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 30.20% return vs 18.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for SPXL.

SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

SPXL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPXL tracks S&P 500, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 0.04% for SCHG.

SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXL and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer