SPXD.L vs. IUIT.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L).
SPXD.L and IUIT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPXD.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Oct 26, 2015. IUIT.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. Both SPXD.L and IUIT.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPXD.L or IUIT.L.
Key characteristics
| SPXD.L | IUIT.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 26.14% | 35.84% |
| 1Y Return | 37.05% | 46.08% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.08% | 16.97% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.81% | 25.63% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.96 | 2.13 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.08 | 2.80 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.55 | 1.37 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.35 | 2.98 |
| Martin Ratio | 18.83 | 9.96 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.80% | 4.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.56% | 20.48% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.98% | -33.46% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.29% | -0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXD.L and IUIT.L is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SPXD.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SPXD.L achieves a 26.14% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 35.84% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPXD.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXD.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPXD.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPXD.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison
SPXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while IUIT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXD.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist | 0.93% | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.87% | 0.00% |
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SPXD.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.98%, roughly equal to the maximum IUIT.L drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXD.L and IUIT.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPXD.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) is 3.73%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that SPXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.