PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPVM vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPVM vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPVM achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SPVM has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 11.89%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.


SPVM

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.16%
YTD
8.29%
6M
10.61%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
11.89%

^GSPC

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.90%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.28%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPVM vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
8.29%20.47%15.64%5.53%-2.10%28.86%-3.18%29.33%-9.17%14.70%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.35%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SPVM and ^GSPC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2011

0.72

The correlation between SPVM and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPVM vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPVM
SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPVM vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPVM^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

2.93

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.33

13.52

+2.81

SPVM vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPVM and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPVM^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.24

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.73

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.76

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.47

+0.15

Drawdowns

SPVM vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPVM drawdown since its inception was -45.35%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPVM and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPVM^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.35%

-56.78%

+11.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-9.10%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.66%

-18.90%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.48%

-25.43%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.35%

-33.92%

-11.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.74%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-10.72%

+5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.97%

-0.25%

Volatility

SPVM vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPVM^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.93%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.48%

8.99%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

11.89%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

16.90%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

18.06%

+1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPVM and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^GSPC has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to SPVM (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPVM dropped -45.35% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPVM and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer