PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUS vs. SPSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUS vs. SPSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF (SPSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUS achieves a 15.14% return, which is significantly higher than SPSK's 0.05% return.


SPUS

1D
0.00%
1M
2.51%
6M
15.90%
YTD
15.14%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
23.09%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.71%

SPSK

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.38%
6M
0.07%
YTD
0.05%
1Y
1.93%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.05M$3.65M$5.83M
$39.11M$27.53M$28.71M

SPUS vs. SPSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
15.14%19.77%26.49%34.24%-22.76%35.92%25.68%-0.83%
SPSK
SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF
0.05%6.16%2.95%3.95%-7.75%-1.30%3.67%0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUS and SPSK is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2019

0.22

The correlation between SPUS and SPSK shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (5 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUS vs. SPSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SPSK
SPSK Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSK Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSK Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPUS vs. SPSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF (SPSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPUSSPSKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.09

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

0.68

+2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

2.03

+7.17

SPUS vs. SPSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the SPSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUS and SPSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPUS vs. SPSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, which is greater than SPSK's maximum drawdown of -12.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and SPSK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUSSPSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.80%

-12.83%

-17.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-2.85%

-7.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.82%

-3.02%

-19.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.06%

-12.45%

-15.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-1.00%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-3.75%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

0.95%

+2.16%

Volatility

SPUS vs. SPSK - Volatility Comparison

SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF (SPSK) at 0.75%. This indicates that SPUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUSSPSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

0.75%

+4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

2.47%

+10.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.96%

3.66%

+12.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.53%

5.26%

+14.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.27%

5.41%

+15.86%

SPUS vs. SPSK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SPSK's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUS vs. SPSK - Dividend Comparison

SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than SPSK's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SPSK
SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF
4.49%3.63%3.53%2.95%2.22%2.56%1.78%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.52%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPUS and SPSK have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPUS has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to SPSK (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUS dropped -30.80% vs SPSK's -12.83%.

On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 15.21% vs 0.89% for SPSK. On fees, SPUS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SPSK has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 0.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPSK.

SPSK has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 0.52% for SPUS.

SPUS is categorized as S&P 500, while SPSK is Global Bonds. SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while SPSK tracks Dow Jones Sukuk Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SPUS and 0.50% for SPSK.

SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUS and SPSK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer