PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SPUC vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SPUC and BDGS is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

SPUC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.99%
15.63%
SPUC
BDGS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SPUC:

1.44

BDGS:

4.76

Sortino Ratio

SPUC:

1.94

BDGS:

9.33

Omega Ratio

SPUC:

1.26

BDGS:

2.75

Calmar Ratio

SPUC:

2.13

BDGS:

8.93

Martin Ratio

SPUC:

6.25

BDGS:

52.07

Ulcer Index

SPUC:

4.95%

BDGS:

0.41%

Daily Std Dev

SPUC:

21.48%

BDGS:

4.48%

Max Drawdown

SPUC:

-29.20%

BDGS:

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

SPUC:

-5.42%

BDGS:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUC achieves a 31.42% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 21.28% return.


SPUC

YTD

31.42%

1M

-4.38%

6M

5.99%

1Y

30.93%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

21.28%

1M

2.39%

6M

15.63%

1Y

21.37%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPUC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for SPUC: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SPUC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SPUC, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.444.76
The chart of Sortino ratio for SPUC, currently valued at 1.94, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.949.33
The chart of Omega ratio for SPUC, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.262.75
The chart of Calmar ratio for SPUC, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.138.93
The chart of Martin ratio for SPUC, currently valued at 6.25, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.2552.07
SPUC
BDGS

The current SPUC Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 4.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUC and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.44
4.76
SPUC
BDGS

Dividends

SPUC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

SPUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while BDGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2023202220212020
SPUC
Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF
0.89%1.33%1.53%2.10%0.75%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.00%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SPUC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUC drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUC and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-5.42%
0
SPUC
BDGS

Volatility

SPUC vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) has a higher volatility of 8.99% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.55%. This indicates that SPUC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.99%
1.55%
SPUC
BDGS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab