PortfoliosLab logo
SPTN vs. LUMN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SPTN and LUMN is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

SPTN vs. LUMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SpartanNash Company (SPTN) and Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SPTN:

-0.02

LUMN:

1.73

Sortino Ratio

SPTN:

0.30

LUMN:

3.45

Omega Ratio

SPTN:

1.04

LUMN:

1.43

Calmar Ratio

SPTN:

0.04

LUMN:

2.50

Martin Ratio

SPTN:

0.17

LUMN:

6.56

Ulcer Index

SPTN:

11.08%

LUMN:

36.23%

Daily Std Dev

SPTN:

30.35%

LUMN:

133.51%

Max Drawdown

SPTN:

-92.38%

LUMN:

-95.26%

Current Drawdown

SPTN:

-42.78%

LUMN:

-78.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SPTN:

$654.25M

LUMN:

$4.34B

EPS

SPTN:

$0.01

LUMN:

-$0.32

PEG Ratio

SPTN:

3.08

LUMN:

54.58

PS Ratio

SPTN:

0.07

LUMN:

0.33

PB Ratio

SPTN:

0.91

LUMN:

13.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

SPTN:

$6.74B

LUMN:

$13.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SPTN:

$1.07B

LUMN:

$5.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

SPTN:

$104.77M

LUMN:

$3.77B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTN achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly higher than LUMN's -17.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SPTN has outperformed LUMN with an annualized return of -1.63%, while LUMN has yielded a comparatively lower -13.09% annualized return.


SPTN

YTD

5.41%

1M

-0.52%

6M

3.16%

1Y

-0.46%

5Y*

5.29%

10Y*

-1.63%

LUMN

YTD

-17.33%

1M

16.76%

6M

-54.22%

1Y

227.61%

5Y*

-11.39%

10Y*

-13.09%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SPTN vs. LUMN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SPTN is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SPTN is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SPTN is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SPTN is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SPTN is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SPTN is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

LUMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LUMN is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LUMN is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LUMN is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LUMN is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LUMN is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LUMN is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SPTN vs. LUMN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SpartanNash Company (SPTN) and Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SPTN Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the LUMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTN and LUMN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SPTN vs. LUMN - Dividend Comparison

SPTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, while LUMN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SPTN
SpartanNash Company
4.57%4.75%3.75%2.78%3.11%4.42%5.34%4.19%2.47%1.52%2.50%1.84%
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%14.37%7.97%10.26%7.57%14.26%12.95%9.08%8.59%5.46%

Drawdowns

SPTN vs. LUMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTN drawdown since its inception was -92.38%, roughly equal to the maximum LUMN drawdown of -95.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTN and LUMN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SPTN vs. LUMN - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

SPTN vs. LUMN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SpartanNash Company and Lumen Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B4.50B5.00B5.50B20212022202320242025
2.26B
3.18B
(SPTN) Total Revenue
(LUMN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SPTN vs. LUMN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SpartanNash Company and Lumen Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
16.1%
47.0%
(SPTN) Gross Margin
(LUMN) Gross Margin
SPTN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SpartanNash Company reported a gross profit of 364.50M and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.1%.

LUMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 3.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.0%.

SPTN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SpartanNash Company reported an operating income of 29.04M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

LUMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 107.00M and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

SPTN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SpartanNash Company reported a net income of -35.08M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of -1.6%.

LUMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -201.00M and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.