PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPTL vs. BLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPTL vs. BLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTL achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than BLV's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SPTL has underperformed BLV with an annualized return of -1.24%, while BLV has yielded a comparatively higher 0.91% annualized return.


SPTL

1D
-0.68%
1M
1.96%
YTD
0.39%
6M
0.39%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
-0.77%
5Y*
-5.60%
10Y*
-1.24%

BLV

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.61%
YTD
0.81%
6M
0.84%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
1.85%
5Y*
-3.65%
10Y*
0.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTL vs. BLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPTL
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF
0.39%5.28%-6.23%3.30%-29.44%-4.99%18.07%13.74%-1.57%9.01%
BLV
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF
0.81%6.44%-3.65%7.35%-26.95%-2.89%16.13%18.99%-4.17%10.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTL and BLV is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2007

0.91

The correlation between SPTL and BLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPTL vs. BLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTL
SPTL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SPTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

BLV
BLV Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTL vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPTLBLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.12

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

0.96

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

2.34

-0.78

SPTL vs. BLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is comparable to the BLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTL and BLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPTL vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTL drawdown since its inception was -46.20%, which is greater than BLV's maximum drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTL and BLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPTLBLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.20%

-38.29%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.04%

-5.73%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-15.16%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.02%

-36.27%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.20%

-38.29%

-7.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.38%

-23.74%

-12.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-9.55%

-4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.34%

+0.49%

Volatility

SPTL vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL) has a higher volatility of 2.10% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) at 1.97%. This indicates that SPTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPTLBLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

1.97%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.13%

5.76%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.68%

7.98%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.58%

12.93%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.95%

11.99%

+1.96%

SPTL vs. BLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPTL and BLV have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPTL vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison

SPTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than BLV's 4.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLV
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF
4.78%4.67%5.09%4.06%4.17%3.37%6.12%3.57%4.07%3.63%4.16%4.37%
SPTL
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF
4.18%4.12%4.03%3.24%2.75%1.68%1.71%2.45%2.69%2.53%2.56%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SPTL and BLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPTL has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to BLV (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTL dropped -46.20% vs BLV's -38.29%.

On 10-year performance, BLV leads with 0.91% vs -1.24% for SPTL. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, BLV has been the lower-risk option at 1.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BLV has performed better with a 0.91% return vs -1.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTL and BLV have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

BLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 4.18% for SPTL.

SPTL is categorized as Government Bonds, while BLV is Long-Term Bond. SPTL tracks Bloomberg Long U.S. Treasury Index, while BLV tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard.

BLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPTL and BLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer