PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPTE vs. QQMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPTE vs. QQMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTE achieves a 40.74% return, which is significantly higher than QQMG's 20.90% return.


SPTE

1D
0.58%
1M
7.25%
YTD
40.74%
6M
41.80%
1Y
71.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQMG

1D
-0.32%
1M
2.93%
YTD
20.90%
6M
19.99%
1Y
42.87%
3Y*
28.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTE vs. QQMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPTE
SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF
40.74%26.37%33.28%5.52%
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
20.90%22.16%25.66%5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTE and QQMG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023

0.91

The correlation between SPTE and QQMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPTE vs. QQMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPTE
QQMG

Technology

98.9%
63.1%

Healthcare

0.3%
3.4%

Industrials

0.2%
1.4%

Energy

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Communication Services

-

13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

0.2%

Technology

SPTE
98.9%
QQMG
63.1%

Healthcare

SPTE
0.3%
QQMG
3.4%

Industrials

SPTE
0.2%
QQMG
1.4%

Energy

SPTE
0.1%
QQMG

-

Basic Materials

SPTE

-

QQMG
1.4%

Communication Services

SPTE

-

QQMG
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SPTE

-

QQMG
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPTE

-

QQMG
5.6%

Financial Services

SPTE

-

QQMG
0.2%

Real Estate

SPTE

-

QQMG
0.1%

Utilities

SPTE

-

QQMG
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPTE vs. QQMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTE
SPTE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SPTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

QQMG
QQMG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTE vs. QQMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPTEQQMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.40

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.19

3.40

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.04

12.30

+5.74

SPTE vs. QQMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is comparable to the QQMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTE and QQMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPTE vs. QQMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTE drawdown since its inception was -25.55%, smaller than the maximum QQMG drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTE and QQMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPTEQQMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.55%

-35.43%

+9.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-12.67%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-1.20%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-9.54%

+5.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

3.50%

+0.46%

Volatility

SPTE vs. QQMG - Volatility Comparison

SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE) has a higher volatility of 12.27% compared to Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) at 8.38%. This indicates that SPTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPTEQQMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.27%

8.38%

+3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.49%

14.77%

+5.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.38%

18.41%

+5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.47%

23.75%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.47%

23.75%

+2.72%

SPTE vs. QQMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QQMG's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPTE vs. QQMG - Dividend Comparison

SPTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than QQMG's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.44%0.41%0.50%0.60%0.82%0.08%
SPTE
SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF
0.68%0.96%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, SPTE and QQMG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPTE has higher volatility (12.27%) compared to QQMG (8.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTE dropped -25.55% vs QQMG's -35.43%.

On 1-year performance, SPTE leads with 71.26% vs 42.87% for QQMG. On fees, QQMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QQMG has been the lower-risk option at 8.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPTE has performed better with a 71.26% return vs 42.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPTE.

SPTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.44% for QQMG.

SPTE is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQMG is Nasdaq-100. SPTE tracks S&P Global 1200 Shariah Information Technology Capped Index, while QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPTE and 0.20% for QQMG.

SPTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPTE and QQMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer