SPTE vs. QQMG
SPTE (SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF) and QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPTE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Shariah Information Technology Capped Index, while QQMG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPTE returned 71.26% vs 42.87% for QQMG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPTE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQMG.
Performance
SPTE vs. QQMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPTE achieves a 40.74% return, which is significantly higher than QQMG's 20.90% return.
SPTE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 7.25%
- YTD
- 40.74%
- 6M
- 41.80%
- 1Y
- 71.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQMG
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 20.90%
- 6M
- 19.99%
- 1Y
- 42.87%
- 3Y*
- 28.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTE vs. QQMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTE SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF | 40.74% | 26.37% | 33.28% | 5.52% |
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 20.90% | 22.16% | 25.66% | 5.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPTE and QQMG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SPTE and QQMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPTE vs. QQMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPTE
QQMG
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SPTE
QQMG
Healthcare
SPTE
QQMG
Industrials
SPTE
QQMG
Energy
SPTE
QQMG
-
Basic Materials
SPTE
-
QQMG
Communication Services
SPTE
-
QQMG
Consumer Cyclical
SPTE
-
QQMG
Consumer Defensive
SPTE
-
QQMG
Financial Services
SPTE
-
QQMG
Real Estate
SPTE
-
QQMG
Utilities
SPTE
-
QQMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPTE vs. QQMG — Risk / Return Rank
SPTE
QQMG
SPTE vs. QQMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPTE | QQMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.40 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.19 | 3.40 | +1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.04 | 12.30 | +5.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPTE vs. QQMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPTE drawdown since its inception was -25.55%, smaller than the maximum QQMG drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTE and QQMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPTE | QQMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.55% | -35.43% | +9.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -12.67% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -1.20% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -9.54% | +5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 3.50% | +0.46% |
Volatility
SPTE vs. QQMG - Volatility Comparison
SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE) has a higher volatility of 12.27% compared to Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) at 8.38%. This indicates that SPTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPTE | QQMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.27% | 8.38% | +3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.49% | 14.77% | +5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.38% | 18.41% | +5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.47% | 23.75% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.47% | 23.75% | +2.72% |
SPTE vs. QQMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPTE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QQMG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPTE vs. QQMG - Dividend Comparison
SPTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than QQMG's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.44% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.60% | 0.82% | 0.08% |
SPTE SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF | 0.68% | 0.96% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SPTE and QQMG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPTE has higher volatility (12.27%) compared to QQMG (8.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTE dropped -25.55% vs QQMG's -35.43%.
On 1-year performance, SPTE leads with 71.26% vs 42.87% for QQMG. On fees, QQMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QQMG has been the lower-risk option at 8.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPTE has performed better with a 71.26% return vs 42.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPTE.
SPTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.44% for QQMG.
SPTE is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQMG is Nasdaq-100. SPTE tracks S&P Global 1200 Shariah Information Technology Capped Index, while QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPTE and 0.20% for QQMG.
SPTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPTE and QQMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer