SPRY vs. STZ
SPRY (Silverback Therapeutics Inc) and STZ (Constellation Brands, Inc.) are both stocks. SPRY operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while STZ operates in Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, SPRY returned -20.88%/yr vs -7.06%/yr for STZ. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SPRY vs. STZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPRY achieves a -11.76% return, which is significantly lower than STZ's 5.30% return.
SPRY
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- 29.47%
- YTD
- -11.76%
- 6M
- -6.80%
- 1Y
- -37.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- -20.88%
- 10Y*
- —
STZ
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 4.34%
- 1Y
- -9.82%
- 3Y*
- -14.32%
- 5Y*
- -7.06%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
SPRY vs. STZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPRY Silverback Therapeutics Inc | -11.76% | 10.43% | 92.52% | -35.76% | 28.08% | -85.63% | 59.79% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 5.30% | -35.99% | -7.11% | 5.83% | -6.43% | 16.12% | 4.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPRY and STZ is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
SPRY:
$1.02B
STZ:
$24.90B
SPRY:
-$2.00
STZ:
$11.23
SPRY:
10.26
STZ:
2.74
SPRY:
16.65
STZ:
2.97
SPRY:
$98.99M
STZ:
$9.14B
SPRY:
$59.93M
STZ:
$4.71B
SPRY:
-$194.60M
STZ:
$3.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPRY vs. STZ — Risk / Return Rank
SPRY
STZ
SPRY vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silverback Therapeutics Inc (SPRY) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPRY | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.97 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | -0.37 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | -0.65 | -0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPRY vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPRY drawdown since its inception was -95.20%, which is greater than STZ's maximum drawdown of -67.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPRY and STZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPRY | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.20% | -67.39% | -27.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.32% | -26.51% | -36.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.32% | -51.28% | -12.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.77% | -51.28% | -40.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.98% | -44.56% | -38.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.26% | -16.62% | -61.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.52% | 15.21% | +29.31% |
Volatility
SPRY vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison
Silverback Therapeutics Inc (SPRY) has a higher volatility of 18.34% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 8.56%. This indicates that SPRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPRY | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.34% | 8.56% | +9.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.49% | 23.48% | +22.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.37% | 30.33% | +36.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.08% | 24.58% | +55.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.79% | 26.99% | +53.80% |
Dividends
SPRY vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison
SPRY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPRY Silverback Therapeutics Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 2.85% | 2.95% | 1.77% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% |
Financials
SPRY vs. STZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silverback Therapeutics Inc and Constellation Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SPRY and STZ have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPRY has higher volatility (18.34%) compared to STZ (8.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPRY dropped -95.20% vs STZ's -67.39%.
STZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPRY and STZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer