SPOG.L vs. FILL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) and iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL).
SPOG.L and FILL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPOG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Sep 16, 2011. FILL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Energy Producers Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. Both SPOG.L and FILL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPOG.L or FILL.
Key characteristics
SPOG.L | FILL | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 5.96% | 6.00% |
1Y Return | 1.41% | 6.22% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 15.16% | 15.07% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 13.51% | 10.20% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 2.88% | 4.33% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.26 | 0.37 |
Sortino Ratio | 0.49 | 0.60 |
Omega Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.21 | 0.45 |
Martin Ratio | 0.51 | 1.05 |
Ulcer Index | 10.53% | 5.65% |
Daily Std Dev | 20.65% | 16.17% |
Max Drawdown | -76.49% | -65.98% |
Current Drawdown | -14.64% | -8.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPOG.L and FILL is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SPOG.L vs. FILL - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPOG.L having a 5.96% return and FILL slightly higher at 6.00%. Over the past 10 years, SPOG.L has underperformed FILL with an annualized return of 2.88%, while FILL has yielded a comparatively higher 4.33% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPOG.L vs. FILL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPOG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FILL's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPOG.L vs. FILL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) and iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPOG.L vs. FILL - Dividend Comparison
SPOG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF | 4.02% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.93% | 3.97% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.10% | 2.75% | 3.41% | 2.43% | 2.46% |
Drawdowns
SPOG.L vs. FILL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPOG.L drawdown since its inception was -76.49%, which is greater than FILL's maximum drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOG.L and FILL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPOG.L vs. FILL - Volatility Comparison
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) at 3.33%. This indicates that SPOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FILL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.