SPLT.L vs. ^GSPC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) and S&P 500 (^GSPC).
SPLT.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Platinum. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPLT.L or ^GSPC.
Key characteristics
| SPLT.L | ^GSPC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.36% | 22.47% |
| 1Y Return | 5.89% | 35.39% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.30% | 9.22% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.90% | 14.40% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -0.48% | 11.89% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.23 | 2.69 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.51 | 3.58 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.06 | 1.49 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.14 | 2.37 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.63 | 17.17 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.34% | 1.96% |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.12% | 12.50% |
| Max Drawdown | -58.05% | -56.78% |
| Current Drawdown | -36.78% | -0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLT.L and ^GSPC is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SPLT.L vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SPLT.L achieves a -2.36% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 22.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLT.L has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -0.48%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.89% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPLT.L vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
SPLT.L vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLT.L drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLT.L and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPLT.L vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.00%. This indicates that SPLT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.