SPLP vs. CMTFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Steel Partners Holdings L.P. (SPLP) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX).
CMTFX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 8, 2000.
Performance
SPLP vs. CMTFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPLP vs. CMTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLP Steel Partners Holdings L.P. | 16.25% | 1.06% | 6.40% | -6.54% | 1.90% | 290.70% | -11.16% | -9.70% | -28.34% | 28.68% |
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | -10.17% | 25.10% | 31.72% | 56.85% | -34.63% | 23.04% | 49.65% | 44.21% | -1.26% | 43.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLP achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly higher than CMTFX's -10.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLP has underperformed CMTFX with an annualized return of 13.40%, while CMTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.54% annualized return.
SPLP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 16.25%
- 6M
- 18.32%
- 1Y
- 21.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.44%
- 5Y*
- 29.25%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
CMTFX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- -10.17%
- 6M
- -8.43%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 24.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 20.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLP vs. CMTFX — Risk / Return Rank
SPLP
CMTFX
SPLP vs. CMTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Steel Partners Holdings L.P. (SPLP) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPLP | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 1.03 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 1.58 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.22 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 1.70 | -0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.24 | 6.04 | -2.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPLP | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 1.03 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.50 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.84 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.44 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLP and CMTFX is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SPLP vs. CMTFX - Dividend Comparison
SPLP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLP Steel Partners Holdings L.P. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.60% | 1.92% | 0.97% | 0.00% |
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | 3.44% | 3.09% | 1.02% | 2.23% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 0.87% | 2.44% | 5.89% | 3.60% | 0.35% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
SPLP vs. CMTFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLP drawdown since its inception was -77.36%, which is greater than CMTFX's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLP and CMTFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLP | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.36% | -68.28% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.40% | -14.35% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.36% | -39.42% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.36% | -39.42% | -37.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -14.35% | +12.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.63% | -16.40% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.88% | 4.04% | +2.84% |
Volatility
SPLP vs. CMTFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Steel Partners Holdings L.P. (SPLP) is 0.00%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that SPLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPLP | CMTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 7.45% | -7.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.37% | 16.24% | +16.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.68% | 27.01% | +18.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.66% | 25.81% | +12.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.47% | 24.66% | +12.81% |