PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIR vs. STPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPIR vs. STPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPIR vs. STPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.
67.73%-46.70%79.92%1.82%-71.60%-66.23%3.20%
STPZ
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
0.83%6.40%4.30%4.28%-4.49%5.64%1.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIR achieves a 67.73% return, which is significantly higher than STPZ's 0.83% return.


SPIR

1D
6.97%
1M
42.15%
YTD
67.73%
6M
14.47%
1Y
55.50%
3Y*
33.03%
5Y*
-30.94%
10Y*

STPZ

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.08%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
2.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIR vs. STPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIR
SPIR Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIR Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

STPZ
STPZ Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
STPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
STPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
STPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
STPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIR vs. STPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPIRSTPZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

1.61

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

2.30

-0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.33

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

2.92

-1.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.24

8.71

-6.47

SPIR vs. STPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIR Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the STPZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIR and STPZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPIRSTPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.61

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

0.93

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.32

0.89

-1.21

Correlation

The correlation between SPIR and STPZ is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SPIR vs. STPZ - Dividend Comparison

SPIR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STPZ
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
3.59%3.65%1.97%1.63%5.88%3.65%1.86%1.76%2.23%1.51%0.65%0.49%

Drawdowns

SPIR vs. STPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIR drawdown since its inception was -97.74%, which is greater than STPZ's maximum drawdown of -6.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIR and STPZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPIRSTPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.74%

-6.77%

-90.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.04%

-1.35%

-48.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.74%

-6.70%

-91.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.48%

-0.37%

-91.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.64%

-1.32%

-76.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.93%

0.45%

+23.48%

Volatility

SPIR vs. STPZ - Volatility Comparison

Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) has a higher volatility of 22.96% compared to PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) at 0.72%. This indicates that SPIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPIRSTPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.96%

0.72%

+22.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.32%

1.21%

+68.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.49%

2.38%

+84.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.47%

3.30%

+90.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.09%

2.98%

+87.11%