SPIB vs. HYG
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG).
SPIB and HYG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPIB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Credit - Corporate - Investment Grade - Intermediate. It was launched on Feb 10, 2009. HYG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 11, 2007. Both SPIB and HYG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPIB or HYG.
Key characteristics
| SPIB | HYG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.00% | 8.49% |
| 1Y Return | 8.37% | 13.41% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.29% | 2.81% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.58% | 3.55% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.54% | 3.97% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.37 | 3.06 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.70 | 4.84 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.45 | 1.60 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.08 | 2.61 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.22 | 23.68 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.76% | 0.61% |
| Daily Std Dev | 3.94% | 4.76% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.94% | -34.24% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.92% | -0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPIB and HYG is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SPIB vs. HYG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SPIB achieves a 4.00% return, which is significantly lower than HYG's 8.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SPIB has underperformed HYG with an annualized return of 2.54%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively higher 3.97% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPIB vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPIB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPIB vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPIB vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison
SPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than HYG's 5.89% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPIB SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.39% | 3.83% | 2.65% | 1.58% | 2.18% | 3.04% | 3.04% | 2.79% | 2.69% | 2.70% | 2.65% | 3.03% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.89% | 5.75% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% | 5.69% | 6.10% |
Drawdowns
SPIB vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPIB drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum HYG drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIB and HYG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPIB vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) have volatilities of 1.15% and 1.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.