SPHQ vs. SPYG
SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index while SPYG tracks the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ returned 14.98%/yr vs 18.32%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
SPHQ vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPHQ having a 15.16% return and SPYG slightly lower at 14.87%. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 14.98%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.32% annualized return.
SPHQ
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 6.56%
- YTD
- 15.16%
- 6M
- 16.32%
- 1Y
- 23.61%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 8.31%
- YTD
- 14.87%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 36.19%
- 3Y*
- 28.58%
- 5Y*
- 16.62%
- 10Y*
- 18.32%
SPHQ vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 15.16% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 14.87% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHQ and SPYG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2005 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPHQ and SPYG has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPHQ vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHQ
SPYG
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPHQ
SPYG
Industrials
SPHQ
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
SPHQ
SPYG
Financial Services
SPHQ
SPYG
Healthcare
SPHQ
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
SPHQ
SPYG
Basic Materials
SPHQ
SPYG
Communication Services
SPHQ
SPYG
Utilities
SPHQ
SPYG
Energy
SPHQ
SPYG
Real Estate
SPHQ
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHQ vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
SPHQ
SPYG
SPHQ vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPHQ | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 2.27 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | 3.07 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.71 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.50 | 11.22 | +0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPHQ | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.27 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.79 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.89 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.36 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
SPHQ vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHQ | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -67.63% | +9.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -13.76% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -22.14% | +5.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -32.67% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | -32.67% | +1.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.15% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.70% | -24.33% | +13.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 3.32% | -1.24% |
Volatility
SPHQ vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) is 3.55%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that SPHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHQ | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 4.15% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 12.43% | -2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 16.04% | -3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 21.17% | -4.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 20.65% | -2.78% |
SPHQ vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPHQ vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than SPYG's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.04% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHQ and SPYG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to SPHQ (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.32% vs 14.98% for SPHQ. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.32% return vs 14.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.46% for SPYG.
SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHQ and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer